Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Terry Collins, David Wright, And The Mets/Brewers Kerfuffle

HDTV or simply filmed in widescreen?

It would seem the NHL is very over the top about getting people to watch their product in High Definition due to widescreen telecasts, finer detail, and thus (because of both of the aforementioned reasons) a better telecast for fans to follow.

But the most un-nerving thing about standard 4:3 presentation of the NHL (for all you non technophilies out there, that 4:3 reference is the aspect ratio of a standard television set) is the action is chopped off and thus you miss a lot of what is going on, on ice. I can sit through a telecast as long as they don't jump from camera to camera (EPSN does a great job making me wish I was at games. And, btw, the EPSN spelling isn't incorrect, more on that later), but most fans cannot. Hockey has traditionally translated very poorly to television... ...And thus the NHL is pushing for fans to get HDTV's because of the better translation.

Which is bullshit.

Once again the league does a great job giving the wrong, most costly solution to the problem. They've been upgrading TV equipment and they have HD Telecasts in many markets (if not them all) along with their national TV deals. That does not, however, get non-NHL fans to watch the game. It might INSPIRE NHL fans to drop a wad of cash on an HDTV (which I won't) but it doesn't solve anything, it doesn't bring in new viewers.

How do you resolve this? Well, my solution won't be agreed with by some who will say "This will make the puck even harder to follow" but if the NHL were to start showing games in widescreen on standard telecasts (16:9 aspect ratio - what you see on widescreen DVD's and in movie theaters) you would have a wide glimpse of the action. Oh, those "Annoying" black bars would be at the top and the bottom of the screen but I would gladly take that and seeing all the action over being stuck at one end of the ice and not being able to tell what's going on down ice.

Maybe it won't convert people, but it's a much easier remedy for the problem than asking people to pony up 1500+ dollars for a new TV and then special cable subscriptions for HD channels.

Comment 1 comment  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

I finally got my Bell ExpressVu HDTV setup completed, and while I was awaiting activation of my setup, I was enormously pleased to see the 24/7 free HD channel you can watch to show the capabilities of HD. And then, I got to see the Habs/Bruins game on TSNHD. I sympathize with you to the highest degree. What is the point of broadcasting HD in a 4:3 ratio??? The picture was clearer, but I was expecting the entire screen to be filled and show an enhanced view. 42’’ reduced to about 35. I’m glad the NHL is back, and I make the trip to Ottawa whenever I can to support my Sens, but I long for the days of a 16:9 HD broadcast! What boggles my mind is that the on-screen graphics and in-studio camera shots are 16:9, but the sides are chopped off during on-ice action. So with the scores running across the bottom, I get a 16:9 broadcast from TSN, complemented with a 4:3 broadcast of a game. It’s almost like picture in picture. Disappointed, but patiently waiting…

by Al in Utica, NY on Oct 19, 2005 2:06 AM EDT reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

"The static cling that brings Tampa Bay Lightning fans together", SB Nation's Bolts community is your place for news, commentary and camaraderie.

FanPosts

Pages

Posting Guidelines on Raw Charge

Lined-Up Update (2010 off-season)

Raw Charge apparel

Featured Poll

Poll
20th Anniversary Season poll: Favorite Tampa Bay Lightning logo?

  14 votes | Results

Raw Charge on the Web


Raw Charge on Tumblr

eXTReMe Tracker

Managing Editors

2011-03-06_12_small John Fontana

Imag0026_small Cassie McClellan

Writing Staff

Small Dani Toth

Ads_small Tina Robinson

Beardweekone_small Matt Amos

Photo_small Clark J Brooks

Snowman_in_net_small CAustin