Tocchet is not the victim
Sympathy.
In a word, that summarizes why Rick Tocchet has become the flavor-of-the- month from fans and media personas. Gary Shelton is the latest voice to sympathize for Tocchet's brand of hockey. What brand is that?
It's the inconsistent, maddening brand of hockey that was quite middling for the entire season before falling off a cliff at the Olympic break.
The style of hockey that played up grit and grinding while playing down cohesion, jelling, passing and general offensive skill.
It is the brand of hockey that treated himself as a peer to the players and not as the coach. Someone who would not "go there" with discipline until it was far too late in the season to send a message.
Tocchet has become a sympathetic character in the epilogue of the OK Hockey saga, with thanks to Brian Lawton's "power grab" assistant replacement during the Olympic break. Lawton painted himself as a cowboy of the same variety as former ownership by doing this, and Tocchet's hissy fit reaction has been played down and dismissed because Lawton is more closely associated with former ownership than Tocchet.
Rick Tocchet was as much former-ownership's boy as was Lawton, but that doesn't serve the narrative.
Just look at how Shelton phrases things regarding what should happen with club in general this offseason...
There is something to be said for a solid, cohesive front office where everyone starts from the same point and works toward the same goal, where everyone knows their role, where every follows the same blueprint. It has been a long time since the Lightning was that kind of franchise.
...And how that doesn't necessarily apply for Tocchet. It is as if Tocchet's tenure with the Lightning is not defined beyond three weeks of the Lightning season between January and February while the team's fortunes were looking up:
As for Tocchet, well, he's a tougher call. In February, in fact, most of us thought he was doing a fine job. But in the NHL, finishing last, losing 50 games (counting overtime losses) and fading at the finish are usually firing offenses. If Lawton goes, Tocchet may be in trouble, too, unless he has a connection to the new general manager.
"A fine job"?
Even before the Wes Walz firing in late February, the Lightning had dropped three crucial games before the Olympic break. Those losses continued the larger pattern of the season that we've already touched on - the consistent inconsistency; the lack of cohesion on a revamped defense, etc.
Tocchet, in his career as head coach with the Lightning, has overseen a total of 143 NHL games in two seasons; 66 in 2008-09 and 77 so far this season. His collective record is 50-67-26, a .350 winning percentage. 64 of 143 games have been one goal affairs, with his collective record being 19-19-26 in those encounters. A .296 winning percentage.
And he's doing just fine and is worth bringing back?
Originally, I was planning to take the time to explore the points why Tocchet is being forgiven and excused for also-ran coaching, but with the sympathy element taking off in the media, I'd like to give the other perspective instead. I know why I had forgiven Tocchet in 2008-09 for taking over the team midway through the season: a poorly conditioned, unstable roster. I wanted to give him a full season with a stable roster, a healthy netminder and better conditioning. Joe Henderson of the Tampa Tribune uses that same approach in critiquing Tocchet:
People generally like Tocchet and he was dealt a tough hand here, trying to bring order amid the chaos of the previous owners. He took over after the lamentable 16-game experiment with Barry Melrose ended last year and was handed a team that was a mess both on and off the ice. The Bolts were more competitive this season, but as we greet this Thursday morning they're still 12th in the Eastern Conference and are awaiting formal elimination from the playoff chase.
Tocchet is being granted clemency for the ultimate reason that he was wronged by Brian Lawton. Much like the pop culture is collective sympathizing with Sandra Bullock or Elin Nordgren right now, people side with Tocchet because he was the victim of Lawton's misdeeds. Brian gave them an excuse not to trust him and they're running with it.
Forgiving Tocchet's shortcomings because of Lawton's sins is a mistake. It's overlooking the record of thick-headedness and the lack of results. It's dismissing the team's inconsistency this season and blessing mediocrity for the immediate future. Even when everything was as Tocchet would like it on his coaching staff, the Lightning ultimately struggled under his stewardship and underachieved.
7 comments
|
1 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Since the beginning of this season...
I kept saying to myself “Give him a chance, give him a chance.” But as the season went on, I just had to stop. I was irritated by the constant line changes. Yeah, people were like “hey, if it’s not working he needs to shuffle the lines”. Really? How do you know if the line is great/decent/bad after one game? It happens sometimes, that the linemates click right away, but I believe this is just very rare. You need to get used to each other, spend some time practicing and most of all, playing games together.
There was also one thing I couldn’t stand either. Cassie wrote a great article about it and that would be how Tocchet treated Vinny. He was trying to change his game and you just can’t do that to the player who’s spending his 11th season in the league. That’s just helluh ridiculous.
The whole season long, I was hoping for Marty St. Louis – Vinny Lecavalier line. Adding whoever on the wing with them. Maybe Downie (because I really like how playing on the line with Marty changed his ways), but that’s not the point. People say that being Marty on the line with Vinny for the whole season, Stammer wouldn’t be where he is, as to the number of goals. But seriously, I would give up Stammer’s (possible) Rocket Richard trophy for a playoff berth. And I’m sure Vinny-Marty duo would bring it.
See, from the end of last season, I was hoping there would be a coaching change. I knew that Tocchet wasn’t a good fit. And I suspected that this season would end up like it did. I have to admit that the season did go a bit better than what I was thinking, tho. I was really hoping I would be proven wrong, and it’s really too bad that I wasn’t.
There's nothing quite like the sound of a frozen puck hitting the glass. It makes me happy.
Raw Charge, an SBN Tampa Bay Lightning community.
by Cassie McClellan on Apr 2, 2010 7:37 PM EDT up reply actions
Tocchet was trying to do more than “changing Vinny’s game.” On orders from OK, he was trying to squeeze him into waiving his no movement clause. That’s when he lost the locker room (early December). He also is not an Xs and Os guy..he’s really nothing. After the Lightning fire him, you can bet that he will NEVER be hired as head coach at the NHL level. I don’t even think he would be a good assistant as he has betrayed the only two head coaches he’s ever worked for. Maybe he can be a head coach in the minors.
FINALLY
Thank you for finally seeing through Tocchet’s charade and providing some intelligent analysis of the situation. Believe me, Tocchet would not be a good fit with any hockey team, be it at the bantam and midget levels or in the AHL and NHL. His betrayal and obvious insubordination is just the tip of the iceberg. This guy is NOT respected in any NHL circle. He is NOT respected by his players. And his temper tantrum after the Walz firing not only broke the hockey code (in that you keep those sort of things internal…always) but divided the bench. How is a team supposed to win when a fractured coaching staff has drawn a line in the sand?
And people still insist on pointing the finger at Brian Lawton because he didn’t provide Tocchet with enough talent. Give me a break. This roster has plenty of talent and skill. The problem lies in Tocchet’s lack of a system. In his lack of any real coaching ability. No team can win (or even crack .500) if it’s constantly retreating, laying back and waiting for reinforcements. His constant line shuffling has led to a lack of cohesion and chemistry. Most any hockey player will tell you they like to play within a system. They like to know their role and fulfill that role. They’ll also tell you consistent linemates and/or defensive pairings are important. All Vinny asked for in September was a consistent winger. Remember the interview? He just wanted to know who it would be so he could quit wondering about it and get on with the chemistry/scoring part. Instead, the Lightning’s most expensive player has gotten a revolving door of partners and a public reprimandation for his lack of production from…you guessed it…Rick Tocchet.
Brian Lawton can only do so much. Before Vinik came in he was tied by budgetary constraints and dueling owners. Yet he still went out and brought in players like Ohlund, Walker, Tanguay (would’ve been better if this guy hadn’t sucked all season), etc. Sure the trade deadline came and went with very little movement but I’d much rather have draft picks and a clear direction for the future than a few rent-a-players who would no doubt see a dip in their production under the “direction” of an incapable coach. If nothing else, Lawton has stuck to his “let’s be patient and do what’s necessary to build this thing the right way through drafting and development” guns. His promotion of Jim Johnson may have been awkward but let’s be honest, it’s not like Walz was doing much (likability never wins you the Cup) as evidenced by the Bolts skidding record. Judging by Johnson’s turnaround of the Ads, I’m inclined to believe Lawton truly thought he could help the Lightning right the ship and make a push. And when would have been a good time to make a similar switch? Change is rarely comfortable and if the Bolts were to make a go of it, he needed to pull the trigger.
John couldn’t be more correct when he states, “Forgiving Tocchet’s shortcomings because of Lawton’s sins is a mistake. It’s overlooking the record of thick-headedness and the lack of results.” And the irony of it all is that Tocchet was Len Barrie’s guy. He’s more tied to the old ownership than Lawton and yet if the majority of fans and pundits have their way, Lawton will be the one to go.
by Clearly Thinking on Apr 3, 2010 12:36 PM EDT reply actions 4 recs
I wouldn’t say that Lawton’s completely blameless. I’ve heard that he’s got an very unfavorable reputation with the other GMs, for instance. But I do agree that a larger part of the blame for the teaming failing to at least make playoffs falls on Tocchet’s shoulders.
Very good comment, tho – thank you for sharing your opinion.
There's nothing quite like the sound of a frozen puck hitting the glass. It makes me happy.
Raw Charge, an SBN Tampa Bay Lightning community.
by Cassie McClellan on Apr 3, 2010 10:22 PM EDT up reply actions
I don’t undertand the big debate about Lawton Vs. Tocchet and who’s to blame. They both have been extremely ineffective and should have been axed way back. It’s really not necessary to take one side or the other. Have seen this type of debate on other blogs too..
You’ve always got to have a good guy versus a bad guy, I guess.
There's nothing quite like the sound of a frozen puck hitting the glass. It makes me happy.
Raw Charge, an SBN Tampa Bay Lightning community.
by Cassie McClellan on Apr 4, 2010 12:04 PM EDT up reply actions

by 



















