With the good comes the bad: Mount Suckmore nominations sought
The guys at Puck Daddy have had their running Mount Puckmore series this summer - four faces of each and every NHL franchise. The major players, the major personalities, the guys identified with the franchise.
Jon Jordan was the Lightning blogger asked to pick Mount Puckmore for the Lightning. Every name can be debated to one extent or another, and every name can be agreed with whole heartedly at the same time.
But on the flip-side of this, fans around the league are producing their lists of the negative. The guys who embody the bad aspects of their team/franchise. The guys who personify the malignant side of their team's legacy. For every vaulted Mount Puckmore member or storied name for a franchise, there are a multitude of candidates that may earn a nomination for Mount Suckmore. We'll send you over to Japers Rink to see just one example.
I'm not going to lay out a definitive list. I'd like fan input on everyone and everything. At the same time, I thought it was important to mention candidates for Mount Suckmore should not be guys who played only a handful of games in the NHL, or never stuck. That's a bit unfair.
Also, team history spans a lot further back than the last three seasons. Citing only personnel with the club from recent days is ignoring a much longer team history. That's not to say there aren't immaculate horrors from the past few seasons, that's just trying to make the point that bad spans further back with the Lightning than the last handful of years.
So, here's what I'd like: use comments to nominate bad performances / people in team history. Other members should use the REC function on comments to show support for a particular nomination (or leave a comment in support). While it's easy just to name-names, please don't do that. Back up / flesh out anyone you suggest with a little more substance (stats, history) that backs up your claim.
This post was written by a member of the Raw Charge community and doesn't necessarily express the views or opinions of Raw Charge staff.
37 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
OK Hockey
I list them collectively because collectively they nearly killed this team. They’ve got to be as close to an automatic spot on this list as anyone.
I was about to post a single person that embodies the failings of OK hockey
A single nomination that stands out as a “My-God-What-are-they-thinking” example.
"Seen Cincuenta" -- 04.10.10 -- Raw Charge.
by John Fontana on Aug 13, 2010 6:24 PM EDT up reply actions
I figure there are a lot more worse-things that need to be mentioned and everyone (including myself) was going to harp on the last three years, and ignore the rest of team history.
"Seen Cincuenta" -- 04.10.10 -- Raw Charge.
by John Fontana on Aug 13, 2010 8:08 PM EDT up reply actions
If it has to only be one
…then it has to be Oren Koules. Why him over Barrie? Because he set himself up to be the face of the ownership: lent his initials to the “OK Hockey” nome d’ catastrophe and his section of the Lightning team guide was the biggest of all the owners. The ownership team was a team in name only, and collectively harmed this team for years—and Oren can be the face for that disaster.
Lawton
I list him separately, because one can argue the most bone-headed of deals weren’t entirely his fault—‘cause he wasn’t in charge. Again, though, he should be on the list for obvious reasons.
Barry Melrose
The single absolute embodiment of failings of the last two season… A hot shot pick, a big flashy name, a lack of substance and experience in the current league…
I’d think a lot of fans would simply start jumping on OK Hockey — the braintrust — as the guys they’d suggest for the entire list collectively. MT just suggested them as a singular nomination.
But can Melrose be ignored or forgotten? A head coach of his notriety and how quickly he flamed out? How poorly he ran things? How brazen he was and how hapless the team was under his leadership?
16 games as head coach… The total example of OMG/WTF of the past two years… There is bad, and there is BAD…
"Seen Cincuenta" -- 04.10.10 -- Raw Charge.
by John Fontana on Aug 13, 2010 6:26 PM EDT reply actions 1 recs
Mikael Renberg
His acquisition alone was probably the worst panic-move that the Lightning could have made, considering the circumstances. Phil Esposito loses young Chris Gratton, and makes a fool of himself with the entire Fuzzy Fax situation. After the league settles the dispute and rules in the Flyers favor… Well, instead of taking FIVE first round draft picks (1998-2002) as compensation, Phil sends those picks back to the Flyers for Karl Dyhukis and Renberg.
Renberg was played up, and he went ahead and played down. He went from a tellar Flyers team and playing time with Lindros and LecLaire on the Legion Of Doom, to the Tampa Bay monstrosity of 97-98.
He never reached the vaulted status he had with the Flyers in the mid-1990’s ever again in the NHL. He only lasted a season and change in TB… He was traded back to Philly for none other than Gratton by coach/GM Jacques Demers in 1998
"Seen Cincuenta" -- 04.10.10 -- Raw Charge.
I've been lectured to...
about Renberg being bad only because of injury, but I tend to agree with you. However I probably won’t put him in my 4 as it wasn’t his fault for the circumstances.
Jay Feaster
As much good as Jay did and as much appreciation all of us had for him after winning the Stanley Cup, it was his blind devotion to Jake Goertzen and crew that lead ultimately to the lowest of lows in Lightning organizational history. While Jake Goertzen could be on Mt. Suckmore, he served at the insistence of the GM. It’s a miracle any player drafted during the 2002-2008 year ever reached the NHL with the Lightning.
Don in St Pete
by Don in St Pete on Aug 13, 2010 8:43 PM EDT reply actions 1 recs
A little larger a window on the Jay G. thing, Don, but I think your point is entirely true. I second this nomination.
There was also the constant gambling-addict of Feasters — bet, cover losses, bet again, cover losses… The bets were always on goalies and the covering-of-losses was always roster talent.
"Seen Cincuenta" -- 04.10.10 -- Raw Charge.
by John Fontana on Aug 13, 2010 9:32 PM EDT up reply actions
eh, T.B. goalie history isn't pretty.
Espo hurt the organization with his reliance on Puppa whenit was obvious he couldn’t be counted on. He then threw away a 2nd and 3rd on Ranford.
Dudley traded away high number one picks obstensibly for Cloutier and Weekes and don’t forget he was willing to trade Tucker for Turek straight up. Dallas ended up trading him for a 3rd rounder, I believe, a couple weeks later.
Hours later. Hours. Not weeks. Dallas traded him a short time later.
"Seen Cincuenta" -- 04.10.10 -- Raw Charge.
by John Fontana on Aug 18, 2010 4:40 PM EDT up reply actions
Hey, how come there’s only one player on this list so far?
There's nothing quite like the sound of a frozen puck hitting the glass. It makes me happy.
Raw Charge, an SBN Tampa Bay Lightning community. Follow me on Twitter: @dagmar27.
by Cassie McClellan on Aug 13, 2010 9:35 PM EDT reply actions
Jason freakin Wiemer
8th overall pick and his best season with TB was a whopping 9-9-18. He wins out over the next two because fans had to watch him suck for 4 seasons before he was traded to Calgary. That trade did get the pick that would eventually become Brad Richards though.
Other possibilities:
Nikita Alexeev – another 8th overall pick. 144 games played, 35 points.
Alexander Svitov – 3rd overall pick. 74 games played, 11 points.
Cory Cross – skated as well as most 8 year-olds. Career -48 for the Bolts. Traded for Freddy Modin though.
Marc Denis – Wasn’t in Tampa for long, but posted a solid 18 wins. Thats just under $500K per win for his $8.6 million deal.
by Dr. Nasty on Aug 14, 2010 1:11 PM EDT reply actions 1 recs
I want to touch on Cross
Yoiu bring up great guys (Great for the purpose of this list). I’ve seen a lot of sympathy thrown at Cross from TB fans in the past. I also did a post in the past comparing Lukas Krajicek to Cross.
Why? Cross was pushed into a top pairing role when the truth was he was a bottom pair defeneman.
I’m not trying to apologize for the guy because he’s on my personal list of Mount Suckmore, but I am trying to be open to the counter argument.
"Seen Cincuenta" -- 04.10.10 -- Raw Charge.
by John Fontana on Aug 14, 2010 1:32 PM EDT up reply actions
RICK TOCCHET
Split Marty and Vinny up, assigned improper roles, different lines every period.
About the only good thing he did was give me plenty of material for my blog.
If you had to chose
Who wa worse == Melrose or Tocchet?
"Seen Cincuenta" -- 04.10.10 -- Raw Charge.
by John Fontana on Aug 14, 2010 3:41 PM EDT up reply actions
MELROSE
- tochhet didnt do bad considering the circumstances and basicly forced to coach a team
- melrose on the otherhand did not have faith in our beloved Stamkos, so im goin with melrose over tocchet
Lets go a little further on this one
Tocchet and Lawton had different visions for the club and the personnel didn’t fit what Tocchet wanted. I didn’t like the guy, didn’t like how he didn’t adapt, but to be sort of handcuffed with personnel and getting guys that fit your system, that’s tough.
Melrose? Barry was hands off. No physical training in camp — he said the players should have handled that on their own in the off season. He hurt team conditioning from the get go with taht.
Tocchet, also to his favor, did help Stamkos and Downie both reach their potential. Melrose berated Stamkos as you mentioned… That, and he routinely stepped away from the club and left assistants (including Tocchet) in charge
"Seen Cincuenta" -- 04.10.10 -- Raw Charge.
by John Fontana on Aug 14, 2010 4:48 PM EDT up reply actions
Not so fast...
Stammer owes playing time to him, so I wouldn’t lump Tocchet in with “the worst in franchise history.” Bad, but not the worst.
Agreed. Melrose trumps him easily. I don’t think there was a worse coach than Barry.
"Seen Cincuenta" -- 04.10.10 -- Raw Charge.
by John Fontana on Aug 15, 2010 6:13 PM EDT up reply actions
lawton, barry, melrose, feaster
player one:
tanguay, rumble, meszaros, smith/denis
by TomK91 on Aug 14, 2010 7:51 PM EDT reply actions 1 recs
I feel Tanguay’s been a bit hard done by after last year. Sure, he had a rubbish year and didn’t have the chemistry with Vinny everyone had hoped (based on what was it, half a dozen games at the world juniors nearly 15 years ago?)…. but he came in on a cheap contract looking to prove himself after a downward year. OK, that didn’t work out for us, but did it work out particularly well for him either?
Tick Tock, Tick Tock....
Hard choices
Steve Ludzig (or however you spell his name) comes to mind.
Marc Denis was a flop – Even Columbus fans knew he folded in the 3rd period.
Svitov – A bag of pucks would’ve done us more good.
The Sports Illustrated writer who coined the Bolts as the worst team in professional sports.
Those are my 4.
Request
Please make ONE nomination per post, and then make your case about the nominee.
I
"Seen Cincuenta" -- 04.10.10 -- Raw Charge.
I think I belong on the mountain.
Why me? Well, look at my stats. In 18 years with the team, I have recorded no goals, no assists, no blocked shots and no saves. I haven’t fought to defend my star players, and I haven’t put my body on the line. I’m never on the ice in the final minute of play, and I clearly will never be in the starting lineup. The only thing close to a positive is that I’ve maintained an even +/-. Seriously, I don’t even know when they keep me around.
Fleshing out Marc Denis
He’s been brought up a couple of times but I’d like to give a little more on him and why he’s a worthy candidate for Mount Suckmore:
If you recall, 2005-06 was a inconsistent season in goaltending. One day you’d have John Grahame standing on his head and mesmerizing you and the next you had him making so many bone-headed mistakes, you didn’t understand why he was in the NHL to begin with.
So, in a move attempting to deal with the hole in goal, Jay Feaster shipped out Swedish goalie property Fredrik Norrena and LW Fredrik Modin to the Columbus Blue Jackets for Denis. It was a robbery — for Columbus. Even if neither player excelled for the Blue Jackets… Neither had to do much to show they were a solid addition compared to Denis.
Denis’ likeness was plastered on the St. Pete Times forum, he was paid a huge contract, the expectations were through the roof before he ever played a game. And boy, did he come crashing down quickly. I believe he was the first player ever bought out by the Lightning under the current CBA (there were no buyouts before 2005).
Yet, his acquisition was the beginning of a more pronounced downward spiral. With Modin out of the top six, the Lightning were downt o one effective offensive line combo. Their PK suffered… It was just a very poor gamble that hurt things.
"Seen Cincuenta" -- 04.10.10 -- Raw Charge.
by John Fontana on Aug 18, 2010 2:00 PM EDT reply actions 1 recs
A couple of names I thought about were…
Chris Kontos – Had a nice 1st year but thought he deserved a lot of money and never made it back to the NHL.
Gerard Gallant – Good player and only 30 y.o. when he signed with Tampa, hardly washed up. But, yeah, he was washed up.
But I’m gonna go with Stephane Richer. I can’t even remember why, but one of the very few Lightning that I plain didn’t like after watching him play and he must have said some stuff and acted like a quiter. I’m pretty forgiving, but he along with Brantt Myhers (for hitting on a friend of mine in a demeaning way) and Ken Hodge Jr. (for being a slacker after Espo gave him a chance as a favor to his Dad) are 3 guys I can’t stand.
But my nomination would be Richer as he played the most.
“Gut” answer, with little real logic: Svitov. No idea why I never really liked him – probably because he didn’t play much for the quality of draft pick used to select him and the players who could have been selected instead… even though he was arguably the piece that won us the Cup!
It’s all down to expectations that have been laid down for a player though, and anyone who didn’t reach them – that’s not always the player’s fault so I try and take that into account: The classic example is everyone’s favourite defenceman-of-the-future, Andrej Meszaros. Oh wait, it was just OK who thought that. Well, and Paul Holmgren, clearly.
OK traded far too much for him in the first place (always had a soft spot for Picard, without considering the return from the second round pick the extra first rounder would have freed-up), throw a whole load of money at his direction based on a few good seasons in a very good situation and the result was almost always going to be a big fail on the ice.
Was Mesz simply unable to reach expectations because he was never that good in the first place? Was the pressure too much for him? Or was he just taking the money and running? I’d say the former, so is it fair to include him on this list?
Tick Tock, Tick Tock....
No one's mentioned Steve Oto yet
If you’ve ever read Esposito’s book then I don’t even have to explain the damage he did. Basically he took all the franchise momentum from the first 4-5 years and threw it in the garbage.
Voodoo Five - South Florida Bulls SBN Blog
The Toughest Blog in America
by Jamie DeVriend on Aug 20, 2010 12:58 PM EDT reply actions

by 


















