REPORTS: Dwayne Roloson traded to Tampa Bay
There is breaking news post-game of tonight's OT victory against the New York Rangers.
Chris Botta of NHL Fanhouse / NYI Point Blank has reported via Twitter that the Lightning have (or will) acquire Dwayne Roloson from the New York Islanders. This has now been confirmed by Erik Erlendsson of the Tampa Tribune.
The trade immediately shifts the narrative of the Tampa Bay Lightning goaltending situation and creates more questions on what happens now with Mike Smith or Dan Ellis -- the two goalies who had struggled most of the first half of the season (despite the Bolts ultimate =winning record). Coach Guy Boucher, in post game comments, made a remark that Smith and Ellis would continue to be worked with but Roloson was a great opportunity for the club.
This also signals another cog from the Dan Boyle trade now jettisoned from the organization. Ty Wishart departing is ultimately a cost that needed to be paid in order to upgrade the goaltending situation, and may have proven expendable when reviewing the Lightning's plans for the future.
Wishart, a former first round pick with the San Jose Sharks, has seen all of five games the Lightning during the regular season since his acquisition in summer 2008. All were played during 2008-09.
An official press release from the club is below the fold. We'll have more on this in the coming hours and days.
LIGHTNING ACQUIRE G DWAYNE ROLOSON FROM ISLANDERS
D Ty Wishart Sent to Long Island
TAMPA BAY – The Tampa Bay Lightning have acquired goaltender Dwayne Roloson from the New York Islanders in exchange for defenseman Ty Wishart tonight, Vice President and General Manager Steve Yzerman announced.
"In this trade we give up a promising, former first-round pick. We wish him luck in the Islanders organization," Yzerman said. "In Roloson we have acquired a proven, veteran goaltender who will provide stability in net."
Roloson, 6-foot-1, 170 pounds, has played in 20 games with the Islanders this season, posting a 6-13-1 record, a .916 save percentage and a 2.64 goals-against average. He leads all New York goaltenders each category as well as games played.
A native of Simcoe, Ontario, Roloson has played in 532 career NHL games, posting a career 2.66 goals-against average and a .910 save percentage. He was named to the 2004 NHL All-Star Game. Roloson has played in 33 career Stanley Cup Playoff games, posting an 18-12 record with a .915 save percentage and a 2.56 goals-against average.
Roloson was originally signed as an undrafted free agent by the Calgary Flames on July 4, 1994.
75 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
After tonights game agains the Rangers (I’m a Rangers fan, by the way) I was about to comment about how great Desjardins was and how he’s impressed me and probably the Lightning as well, maybe even to the point that they don’t go after a goalie….guess I was wrong. Roloson is a solid goaltender, and that’s a great move for you guys.
Writer for Pinstripe Alley, MLB Daily Dish
Follow me on twitter @nyybrandonc
Basically I was thinking the same. This one — the timing just seems odd. He played great tonight (thatgoal by you guys in the closing seconds was a great attack BTW)
Typing is an adventure, and reading should be, too!
Raw Charge.
by John Fontana on Jan 1, 2011 11:05 PM EST up reply actions
He made me laugh with his skating around the crease and covering the puck, he seemed pumped for the game. My guess would be they just got the Islanders to agree tonight and weren’t going to let the chance slip because of two performances from a rookie.
Writer for Pinstripe Alley, MLB Daily Dish
Follow me on twitter @nyybrandonc
Desjardins was sent back to Norfolk (AHL) immediately following the game – presumably to make room for Roloson.
Vinny, and Marty, and Steven, and Simon - oh my!
Raw Charge, an SBN Tampa Bay Lightning community. Follow me on Twitter: @dagmar27.
by Cassie McClellan on Jan 1, 2011 11:24 PM EST up reply actions
At least he went out with a bang, I guess.
Writer for Pinstripe Alley, MLB Daily Dish
Follow me on twitter @nyybrandonc
thats awful
no. 1 star plays great both games then we send him down… should be desjardins and roloson as our two goalies. get rid of smellis
And do what with the 2 we have now? Can’t buy out in mid season. And to me it would make more sense for Desjardins to get ample, consistant playing time (even if it is in the minors) than to have him sitting on the bench for the most part in the NHL. He’s still got a lot to learn. He need to play the majority of the time. Not sure that would happen with the Lightning.
Trouble on the ice? Wait! Andre Roy could fix it!!
by Tina Robinson on Jan 1, 2011 11:48 PM EST up reply actions
I was about to say it’s silly for the Lightning to send him down after such a great game, but it’s true that he would likely not have enough playing time in the NHL with Roloson around, so they probably made the right decision.
Writer for Pinstripe Alley, MLB Daily Dish
Follow me on twitter @nyybrandonc
So, I guess that settles the question (at least for the short time) of whether Desjardins will stay or go back...
But what does this do to the goaltending situation? Does it clear things up? Or does it make a muddy situation that much murkier? With (now) three “NHL caliber” goalies on the roster (NOTE: the quotation marks) who is the odd man out? This is odd timing for this move and, for me anyway, it came out of nowhere….
Trouble on the ice? Wait! Andre Roy could fix it!!
I think it makes things murkier.
Vinny, and Marty, and Steven, and Simon - oh my!
Raw Charge, an SBN Tampa Bay Lightning community. Follow me on Twitter: @dagmar27.
by Cassie McClellan on Jan 1, 2011 11:25 PM EST up reply actions
I agree. Not with who would be starting (I presume that to be Roloson) but who do the Lightning keep? And what to do with the one that is left….
Trouble on the ice? Wait! Andre Roy could fix it!!
by Tina Robinson on Jan 1, 2011 11:39 PM EST up reply actions
You send either one down to Norfolk – Smith or Ellis – then you’re cutting into Desjardins & Tokarski’s playing time.
Vinny, and Marty, and Steven, and Simon - oh my!
Raw Charge, an SBN Tampa Bay Lightning community. Follow me on Twitter: @dagmar27.
by Cassie McClellan on Jan 1, 2011 11:42 PM EST up reply actions
That’s why I’m wondering if Stevie Y doesn’t already have something else up his sleeve…
Trouble on the ice? Wait! Andre Roy could fix it!!
by Tina Robinson on Jan 1, 2011 11:44 PM EST up reply actions
He’d almost have to, frankly. Because even sending both Smith & Ellis to Norfolk and keeping Desjardins up still hurts Tokarski. But then, Desjardins has already been sent back down. For now.
Vinny, and Marty, and Steven, and Simon - oh my!
Raw Charge, an SBN Tampa Bay Lightning community. Follow me on Twitter: @dagmar27.
by Cassie McClellan on Jan 1, 2011 11:46 PM EST up reply actions
Well, with Smith still out with the knee injury for the time being, no need for the Lightning to HAVE to do anything immediately. It can be Roloson/Ellis for now. Maybe by the time Smith is ready, they will have a handle on what they want do to with whom…
Trouble on the ice? Wait! Andre Roy could fix it!!
by Tina Robinson on Jan 2, 2011 12:21 AM EST up reply actions
Two questions remain
First: who’s the goalie to go? Second: will Smith/Ellis leave via trade or release? My bet: if a goalie is released, it will be Smitty and if there’s a trade, it will be Elly.
Last note: Cedrick was freaking outstanding tonight—though I’m still wondering why the Bolts left Gaborik alone in the slot.
Can you do unconditional releases in the NHL?
Typing is an adventure, and reading should be, too!
Raw Charge.
by John Fontana on Jan 1, 2011 11:19 PM EST up reply actions
I think all contracts are guaranteed in the NHL, so I don’t believe so.
Vinny, and Marty, and Steven, and Simon - oh my!
Raw Charge, an SBN Tampa Bay Lightning community. Follow me on Twitter: @dagmar27.
by Cassie McClellan on Jan 1, 2011 11:25 PM EST up reply actions
According to a tweet I saw, buyouts cannot happen in the middle of the season. So now what? A trade? Good grief… who’d want either of the ones we have now (Roloson excluded, of course).
Trouble on the ice? Wait! Andre Roy could fix it!!
by Tina Robinson on Jan 1, 2011 11:36 PM EST up reply actions
I’m only going on what was tweeted by the TBLighting feed. Don’t know all the ins and outs. But according to them, the buyouts have to come in the offseason.
Trouble on the ice? Wait! Andre Roy could fix it!!
by Tina Robinson on Jan 2, 2011 12:18 AM EST up reply actions
That's correct
There are two buyout periods, they’re both during the summer.
Lighthouse Hockey: And you shall know us by the fraying of our hips.
I stand corrected
Thanks for the education!
by MTBoltFan on Jan 2, 2011 9:13 AM EST via mobile up reply actions
Also,
As many of us Islander fans know, buyouts count toward your salary cap prorated for twice then length of the deal. So if you have either of those goalies signed for long term, or high $, a buyout may not make sense. For example, if we wanted to buyout DiPietro, we’d be paying for him until 2031. There is some other math involved (as far as year to year cost)…we will see a drop in Yahin’s buyout number next year…I’m not exactly sure why though.
Congrats on getting a very good goaltender and a great guy! You probably will have a lot of Islander fans rooting for you guys to take the cup…especially since you have Bergenheim and Thompson too!
"Gervais...he looks danger in the fist with his face!" JPinVA
Isles fans:
We have most definitely enjoyed Nate and Sean both here this season. They are both great additions to the club and are doing very well. And I’m looking forward to seeing what Roloson can do for us as well.
As far as the goalies go, Mike Smith’s contract is up in June and Ellis was signed for 2 years this past July, so there would be no reason to buy out Smith-he’ll be gone at the end of the season no matter what anyway. That is another reason that I believe that Smith is the odd man out; even buried in the minors (which I am not convinced is the best way to do things because he would be competing with Desjardins and Tokarski for playing time) he’s short term at best.
Trouble on the ice? Wait! Andre Roy could fix it!!
by Tina Robinson on Jan 2, 2011 4:29 PM EST up reply actions
If we Bury (…funny, I’m capitalizing Bury like it’s a M:tG keyword…) Smith, we don’t have to send him to Norfolk. He can be loaned to another AHL team (Caps/Panthers did it with Nylander earlier this year) or in Europe (Blackhawks – Cristobal Huet ) ofcourse we would need a taker for that to happen.
Also it may be emotionally brutal, but (I think) we could send him over to the Everblades…
Thank you. I was not sure, only going on information I had heard, and we all know how “accurate” that can be sometimes. I had never heard of a buyout occurring during the season, so it seemed to be a reasonable assumption.
Thank you for clarifying it.
Trouble on the ice? Wait! Andre Roy could fix it!!
by Tina Robinson on Jan 2, 2011 12:40 PM EST up reply actions
As a Caps fan
Really, really don’t like this trade (meaning, it’s great for you guys)
A Rolo – Desjardins pairing going forward would be a lot better.
I wouldn’t be so surprised, also, to see the Lightning involved in talks for a D-man – maybe Francois Beauchemin from Toronto.
"I'm not a big Yankee fan. It's kinda like living in ancient Rome and rootin' for the lions."
Dont be surprised if somethign is done with Calgary too. There may be players int eh system Jay Feaster wants as his own. And I don’t mean roster players. Most of his NHL guys are gone from the Lightning. But there are prospects he drafted that we still have.
Typing is an adventure, and reading should be, too!
Raw Charge.
by John Fontana on Jan 2, 2011 12:08 AM EST up reply actions
who is in dire need for a goalie right now? and smith/ellis are better than what that team has?
lol now that i think about it the isles need a goalie lol
So Yzerman’s going to make a serious run for the Cup this season after all, huh?
Vinny, and Marty, and Steven, and Simon - oh my!
Raw Charge, an SBN Tampa Bay Lightning community. Follow me on Twitter: @dagmar27.
by Cassie McClellan on Jan 1, 2011 11:46 PM EST reply actions
No – that’s what you wanted to happen. That’s not what you thought would happen.
Vinny, and Marty, and Steven, and Simon - oh my!
Raw Charge, an SBN Tampa Bay Lightning community. Follow me on Twitter: @dagmar27.
by Cassie McClellan on Jan 2, 2011 2:23 PM EST up reply actions
Doubt it still
Rollie’s a playoff goalie, but this team isn’t tooled for a serious Cup run yet. I think we need more depth on D.
thats where a pick + smellis could help us to get a D man....
with downie coming back we prob have the deepest forwards set in the league or close…. we just need more D help… ohlund clark hedman kubina lundin and jones are all fine. we just need one more vet. (i hate smaby so much)
It’s going to take more than a pick to get a D I think. I could see a Feaster roster holdover in Norfolk getting dealt in a package. But, Smellis will have to be piggybacked onto a trade. I’m pretty sure.
Or we’ll have to overpay to get rid of him/them
Typing is an adventure, and reading should be, too!
Raw Charge.
by John Fontana on Jan 2, 2011 12:34 AM EST up reply actions
You’re NOT going to get the top 2 D from the Flames (and their contracts) for an offer like that. Think smaller. Regher has a NTC I think, and Bouwmeester’s contracts is sofa-king huge. And he hates Florida.
…or simply keep it in mind. I don’t think any of the Flames D fits our system. That’s not discrediting them, that’s saying that we need more movement and not hard hits.
Typing is an adventure, and reading should be, too!
Raw Charge.
by John Fontana on Jan 2, 2011 11:19 AM EST up reply actions
Really interesting from Stevie Y
I’d heard the rumors but figured they might wait longer if they were going to move.
But either way, with Yzerman being a very recent former player on a bunch of champions with goalies of varying quality, I was really curious how important he’d see a goalie upgrade, and how much he’d believe in the need for a veteran goalie who carries the old “confidence”-instilling presence back there.
Hope Rollie keeps it up for you guys. He was fun to have as an Islander.
Lighthouse Hockey: And you shall know us by the fraying of our hips.
We’re all still tlaking Desjardins — and I almost think he was the key to getting this done. Indirectly, of course.
But he was solid in the crease, and capable. And that reflected on the team play in front of him. If you’re not in crisis mode worry if you can score more goals than your netminders allow, then great things can happen. And they did.
Dom, I just have to think back to 2 weeks ago in Uniondale to remember how Rollie can do. We were so SO frustrated with him. We… I mean the team. You could see it — they could get nothing past him / couldn’t get him out of position. They physically attacked him (which I was not thrilled with) to try to clear some space in the crease.
Roloson bent, but did not break. Ellis / Smith have been the opposite, they’ve bent and broke.
Typing is an adventure, and reading should be, too!
Raw Charge.
by John Fontana on Jan 2, 2011 11:23 AM EST up reply actions
We’re all still tlaking Desjardins — and I almost think he was the key to getting this done. Indirectly, of course.
Interesting. Like he shined the light on how good the team can do when there’s someone back there who instills some confidence?
Speaking of people running Roloson, he’s pretty good at calling attention to it. Sometimes that’s a dive, but it’s rarely (if ever) fabricated. The refs are so inconsistent with goalie interference calls; he tends to give them friendly Grumpy Old Man reminders.
Lighthouse Hockey: And you shall know us by the fraying of our hips.
Eh. He's obviously an improvement over Smith/Ellis, but now I have no idea what we're gonna do them
I wish we could just ditch them both and have Roloson/Desjardins
I don't know what else to say
other than I really like this move a lot. This team has needed a more consistent and reliable goaltender for a while now. Now we actually have one!
"1 - 2 - Freddy's coming for you, 3 - 4 - Better lock your door, 5 - 6 - Grab your crucifix, 7 - 8 - Better stay up late, 9 - 10 - Never sleep again..."
Just accept the fact he’s not a long term solution past this season. 41?
That being said, he’s more solid than piecemeal solutions that have been brought in since 2005-06 to cover the crease. Piecemeal solutions that turned out not to be too inconsistent..
Typing is an adventure, and reading should be, too!
Raw Charge.
by John Fontana on Jan 2, 2011 11:25 AM EST up reply actions
Yeah he is a bit old
but I still like it all the same. Just gotta find another one in the off season I guess.
"1 - 2 - Freddy's coming for you, 3 - 4 - Better lock your door, 5 - 6 - Grab your crucifix, 7 - 8 - Better stay up late, 9 - 10 - Never sleep again..."
I think next season will be taken care of with Desjardins in the mix. He played very well for 2 games here. I know that 2 good games do not a season (or career) make, but with more consistent playing time (which he would probably not get with the big club) he will be a very good long term solution to the goalie problem.
I also agree that the trade was a good one from the Tampa perspective. And since Smith is still on IR, they have a bit of time to decide what to do with Smith and/or Ellis.
Trouble on the ice? Wait! Andre Roy could fix it!!
by Tina Robinson on Jan 2, 2011 1:02 PM EST up reply actions
my friend just had an interesting thought...
could a possible trade happen that would move smith/ellis + picks to dallas for richie? they want to clear cap space so possible ellis + a few picks could bring richie back.
Why would you bring another forward? If we’re trading any goalie/picks we’re definitely going after D-man.
I'm in love with the Lightning, the Flyers are my fling and I have a crush on the Flyers fans.
Dare to follow my childish, biased, petty and cheesy alter ego.
American Cheese, B!tch! ... #1 mission? Kill Holmgren.
Tom, remember this: Even if Yzerman is willing to make a deal, it’s:
1) Gotta improve the club in a way that makes sense
2) Not going to rob the team long term.
Brad Richards, my favorite Bolt of all time, doesn’t fit. It’s not that he’s a forward (as Kat pointed out) but he’s a center. A top line center at that. Even playing in Boucher’s systemthat makes forwards so inter-changable — it’s just doesn’t make sense.
And it would take a LOT more than Smith / Ellis and a pick to get him. Start with Downie and start adding names off the roster and in the minors.
Typing is an adventure, and reading should be, too!
Raw Charge.
by John Fontana on Jan 2, 2011 11:29 AM EST up reply actions
well the thing is dallas wants to get something for him
becuz they wont sign him but i would just love to see a team stop our powerplay…. vinny, marty, stamkos, richie, gagne/malone…. we would score almost every time. dallas im sure wouldnt mind getting a goalie (ellis) and then throw in like a 3rd, janosik, and mihalik/buekeboom we have tons of D men in our system right now. and either way we could trade one of our other centers for him too (as much as i like moore, he could be expendable for richie) and we know brad will re sign with us hes best friends with vinny. i dont think it would really rob the team long term. we could always trade for another pick or two at the deadline if we need to.
Actually it was noted in the news yesterday that Joe Niewendyk has now been given the ok to talk to Richard’s agent about an extension/re-signing. They had to wait for the ownership situation to become a bit more settled (boy, don’t we know all about THAT), but the ownership has apparently given it’s blessing to try and resign Richie.
Trouble on the ice? Wait! Andre Roy could fix it!!
by Tina Robinson on Jan 2, 2011 12:43 PM EST up reply actions
i dont think they will tho. we will see they might keep him if they still in the playoff hunt but they wont go deep
At this point nobody knows. Since they were just given permission yesterday, talks haven’t even started yet. They very well could resign him but the talks will be complicated because of the ownership flux in Dallas.
It’s my opinion that if Richards is moved (and I really don’t think he will be as long as Dallas is in the playoff hunt) that won’t happen until a lot closer to the trade deadline.
Both Toronto and the Rags have made it known they’d like to secure his services as well. Toronto? Maybe; but I don’t think the Rangers have the pieces to trade for him or the salary cap room to take on his contract.
As much as I like Richie, I just don’t see him as a fit in Tampa, for the time being. Trading good young Dmen isn’t the best idea because those things don’t grow on trees. And Steve Yzerman has made it known time and time again that he will not trade the future for the now. Since his moves have panned out so far, I’m just gonna trust him on this one.
Trouble on the ice? Wait! Andre Roy could fix it!!
by Tina Robinson on Jan 2, 2011 12:56 PM EST up reply actions
The issue has been DEPTH in the Lightning system. We’ve been over thsi before — just because there seems to be depth now doesn’t mean everyone is expendable.
It’s one thing to make the hold over prospects from Feaster’s/Lawton’s regime expendable (Mihalik). It’s another thing to gut recent draft picks (two of the guys you cited). That raids the long term for the short term.
Wishart was expendable long-term. It was never clear where or how he fit. Other forwards have been gestating in the AHL and seeing some playing time in the NHL but ultimately might do better elsewhere (Mihalik, Chewie, Blair Jones). It doesn’t mean sell them off for nothing. Nor does it mean sell off everything you have long term for a guy who doesn’t fit in long term (Richards).
There’s another season after this year, and another, and another. Roloson for someone who doesn’t fit into the plans makes sense. Trading away people who are part of the plans for a single cup run doesn’t make sense either. You gotta be extra careful on the pieces you bring in and the expenses you pay to get those pieces.
Typing is an adventure, and reading should be, too!
Raw Charge.
by John Fontana on Jan 2, 2011 1:22 PM EST up reply actions 1 recs
Rec'd
The Lawton regime has trained us all to think short term and think of splash players. I tend to think Yzerman knows what he’s going to do, and we will all smack our palms on our foreheads and exclaim, “Of course! Why didn’t I think of that option?”
Patience, people. Patience.
OK Hockey, you mean. Lawton was just a pawn in that. The big moves were Barrie and Koules.
Typing is an adventure, and reading should be, too!
Raw Charge.
I think a lot of Bolts fans see them as a group… a three headed monster that almost totally ruined the franchise (either intentionally or unintentionally-through ignorance and/or arrogance).
Trouble on the ice? Wait! Andre Roy could fix it!!
by Tina Robinson on Jan 2, 2011 4:34 PM EST up reply actions
I think Barrie has proved he is an incapable manager with his real estate woes. Let alone his hockey moves.
Praise Jeff Vinik.
Typing is an adventure, and reading should be, too!
Raw Charge.
(sorry late to the thread…)
I’m rather surprise the Isles didn’t take Smith back with their lack of goaltending depth behind permanently about to get injured DiPietro.
http://www.kuklaskorner.com/index.php/psh/comments/islanders_tanking_the_rest_of_the_season/
They had 5 goalies at the AHL and NHL level already
This deal leaves them with four. They want to develop Koskinen and Poulin in the AHL, see if Lawson can handle NHL backup work, and figure out how much work DiPietro’s knee can handle. The latter two impact how important the former two will be.
Lighthouse Hockey: And you shall know us by the fraying of our hips.
I am not convinced of this trade. From the little I have seen of Rolly in the Oilers (and going of the Islanders form), I was not impressed.
I expected Cedrick to get the call-up and play his way into the top spot for the play-offs in the latter part of this season.
Hopefully Rolly can bring something to the Lightning that Smellis has not.
Hi Jon.
Part of me hopes Cedrick knows just what he’s done in TB — he gave a bit of extra hope.
Typing is an adventure, and reading should be, too!
Raw Charge.
Well It’s pretty doubtful he could be worse… and with his numbers this year (on a really bad Isles team) he should be a pretty good upgrade.
Just do remember that Roloson led the Oilers to the SC Final the year the Hurricanes won it. So he may be an old war horse, but I’m thinking (and hoping) that he’s got yet a few more laps left in him.
Trouble on the ice? Wait! Andre Roy could fix it!!
by Tina Robinson on Jan 2, 2011 4:32 PM EST up reply actions
BTW anyone who seen Ced’s games, does the D look better positioned?
I’m wondering since Bourne posted on how goalies can help their defense with communication, and since Ced has is now in his 2nd or 3rd season (please correct me :) )of the Boucher system, I wonder if he is better at ‘moving the pieces’ than Smellis are or Roloston will initially be
BTW John, in your article you alluded to prospect depth…
since the Bolts are playing the trading game, could someone write up a post on who we have and where we project them? (also what picks we lost/gained though trades…)
I think that’s work best covered by www.boltprospects.com Kub. I don’t like stealing their thunder. They are great with that.
Typing is an adventure, and reading should be, too!
Raw Charge.
Cool! Thanks for the link (And for making me forget the rest of the chores I’m supposed to do today :) )

by 





















