"You can't do that!": A salute to aberrations in strategy that somehow haven't ruined sports
With all due respect to Cassandra McClellan and her appeal for a return of sanity and the prevailing of cooler heads, I don't think it's over, not by a long shot. "It" being the hubbub (not quite an uproar...but stay tuned) raised over the Philadelphia Flyers' attempt to thwart the 1-3-1, Tampa T, trap-not-a-trap defensive scheme of the Tampa Bay Lightning when the two teams met the other night in a game won by the Lightning (2-1, in overtime).
Considering the fact that the media, particularly those in town from Philadelphia, were undoubtedly distracted by the events unfolding around the Penn State scandal that night, this situation didn't get the attention it might have under normal circumstances. That's not likely to be the case if it happens again. It's a copycat league, as is the case in all sports, and we have a long way to go this season. Which means it's really more of a question of when, not if. No, I'm afraid we have not seen the last of flailing arms, gnashing teeth and jerking knees over this.
I do agree with her when she points out there is no conspiracy in place. To think otherwise requires believing that the crazy idea of granting Tampa Bay an NHL franchise in 1992 was so a then-21-year-old Guy Boucher could be groomed as an agent of destruction and eventually destroy the league from the inside out. That's awfully impressive long-range planning for an organization that doesn't seem to know what to do with the Phoenix Coyotes.
No, Cassie's right when she says this was simply a case of two teams trying to outfox each other, aberrant only in that it deviates from the way we've all come to expect the game to be played. It's not the first time it's happened in hockey and it certainly won't be the last. Such occurrences aren't even unique to hockey.
Baseball: The Intentional Walk
"Hey batter, I don't think I want to risk you generating offense by hitting the ball a long way with your bat. So how about if you just put it down and go right ahead and take first base and we'll move on to the next guy." "You're just going to let me have first base, with the knowledge that I may eventually score anyway?" "Oh yes, it goes against everything we've ever learned about baseball in regard to keeping runners off base and we're fully aware that someone else could drive you in. But we think this is going to work out." "You're telling me I can generate offense and I don't even have to do anything?" "You got it, my friend." "Sounds too good to be true. Tell you what, you throw four pitches but throw them waaaaay outside and if you do, I promise I won't swing." "Okay, deal."
Football: The Onside Kick
"Okay men, we're in a tight spot here. We just scored but we're still behind and time is running out. We need that ball back!" "But coach, the rules say we have to kick it to the other team. What are we gonna do, coach?" "Oh we'll kick it to 'em, all right. But just a little. Not to the speedy, skinny kid way down the field but to the slow, fat guys right up front. If they miss it, I figure we have at least a 50/50 chance of one of you guys getting it." "That's actually a pretty solid plan, coach. Why don't we do it every time we kick off?" "Ready, BREAK!"
Basketball: The Intentional Foul
"Okay men, we're in a tight spot here. We just scored but we're still behind and time is running out. We need that ball back!" "But coach, the rules say they get possession of the ball after every time we score." "That's why I want you to commit a foul when they try to pass it inbounds. Just grab the guy who gets it." "You...want me to break the rules?" "It's not enough to just break the rules; you need to get caught doing it. That will stop the clock." "But they'll get to shoot free throws, coach. If they make them, that's more points for them." "Well...they might miss!" "Coach, we're down by 33 with :45 left in the game." "Ready, BREAK!"
Soccer: That Thing They Do Where They Pretend To Be Seriously Injured In Order To Draw A Penalty
"Owwwwww! My knee! It's shattered! I'm in agony! Did you see what my opponent did? Argh, the vile treachery! I'll probably never walk again without years of expensive and painful therapy! This transgression can not stand! I demand justice on behalf of my team before I die from pain, internal organ failure and blood loss! Did you see it? Did you?!? No? Well, bollocks then."
See? Other sports survive their weird deviations, some even thrive because of them. Hockey will be just fine.
26 comments
|
1 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
So I’m Cassandra now, am I? :o|
"You don't have enough talent to win on talent alone." -Herb Brooks
Raw Charge, an SBN Tampa Bay Lightning community. Follow me on Twitter: @dagmar27.
by Cassie McClellan on Nov 11, 2011 6:40 PM EST reply actions
and a "C" has disappeared from your name over the past couple days
Heel for school, Vol for life!
Bolts, Preds, Canes (childhood team, home state team, hometown team). Canes mini-STH. Southern hockey solidarity!
by Incipient_Senescence on Nov 11, 2011 6:43 PM EST up reply actions
wait a minute. . .
does that mean you traded Vinny? You fiend!
Heel for school, Vol for life!
Bolts, Preds, Canes (childhood team, home state team, hometown team). Canes mini-STH. Southern hockey solidarity!
by Incipient_Senescence on Nov 11, 2011 6:43 PM EST up reply actions
No, it means that people think I’m related to the Sharks head coach. I fixed it, tho. :o\
"You don't have enough talent to win on talent alone." -Herb Brooks
Raw Charge, an SBN Tampa Bay Lightning community. Follow me on Twitter: @dagmar27.
by Cassie McClellan on Nov 11, 2011 6:44 PM EST up reply actions
ah, I see
still wrong in QotW
Heel for school, Vol for life!
Bolts, Preds, Canes (childhood team, home state team, hometown team). Canes mini-STH. Southern hockey solidarity!
by Incipient_Senescence on Nov 11, 2011 6:46 PM EST up reply actions
Dang it. Well, I’ll have to fix that, too. Thanks! I didn’t notice.
"You don't have enough talent to win on talent alone." -Herb Brooks
Raw Charge, an SBN Tampa Bay Lightning community. Follow me on Twitter: @dagmar27.
by Cassie McClellan on Nov 11, 2011 7:09 PM EST up reply actions
OH, I see what's going on...
Cassie says let it go…Clark says it ain’t over.
One appealing to my Zen-like “trying to be the bigger fan” side, the other to my thirst for vengeance and my own argumentative nature…
Welll..
I’ll let it go… until I hear another brainless talking head spit out the Northeast company line or an ignorant comment following a well thought out, cogent blog post.
THEN I’ll let it go again.
HAAA! I am winning at this point…I think, but I’m not being influenced!
…or am I?
"Coach doesn't like hard-working...Coach likes Relentless." Eric Brewer
@b0lted_d0wn on Twitter ... Bolted Down on Facebook
I lurk, sometimes I even speak...Go Boltz!!
Er…Prozac? ;o)
"You don't have enough talent to win on talent alone." -Herb Brooks
Raw Charge, an SBN Tampa Bay Lightning community. Follow me on Twitter: @dagmar27.
by Cassie McClellan on Nov 11, 2011 8:24 PM EST up reply actions
Things that didn't kill hockey when they were supposed to:
the forward pass
the offside rule
allowing goaltenders to kneel or lay on the ice (see also, the butterfly)
expansion (see also, contraction)
televised games
Willie O’Ree (see also, Jordin Tootoo)
Eastern Europeans
helmets
a player’s union
the salary cap
I got tired at this point, but there are more…..
[Note all of these are NHL changes; you could get into other leagues and international standards, too]
R.I.P. Belak, Rypien, Boogaard, Lokomotiv.
Part Predator, part Lightning.
First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then you win.
by CAustin on Nov 11, 2011 7:39 PM EST reply actions 1 recs
Another two for the list, and this will likely be met with debate:
Gary Bettman
The shootout
Typing is an adventure, and reading should be, too!
Raw Charge.
by John Fontana on Nov 12, 2011 9:56 AM EST up reply actions
How about...
…Hockey below the Mason-Dixon line?
by Clark J Brooks on Nov 12, 2011 10:02 AM EST up reply actions 1 recs
Nah – the Caps are still socially acceptable, for some weird reason.
"You don't have enough talent to win on talent alone." -Herb Brooks
Raw Charge, an SBN Tampa Bay Lightning community. Follow me on Twitter: @dagmar27.
by Cassie McClellan on Nov 12, 2011 12:07 PM EST up reply actions
damn Yankees
Heel for school, Vol for life!
Bolts, Preds, Canes (childhood team, home state team, hometown team). Canes mini-STH. Southern hockey solidarity!
by Incipient_Senescence on Nov 12, 2011 1:45 PM EST up reply actions
I’d almost be offended by that, but I’m from the West and not a Northeasterner (a Yankee), so it’s all good. ;o)
"You don't have enough talent to win on talent alone." -Herb Brooks
Raw Charge, an SBN Tampa Bay Lightning community. Follow me on Twitter: @dagmar27.
by Cassie McClellan on Nov 12, 2011 2:20 PM EST up reply actions
I’m offended. I’m from the northeast and I hate the Yankees. The evil empire must be stopped… :-p
Really, I do take offense to the wide sweeping “Yanks” and “yankees” reference to Americans specifically because of that team. Ugh.
Typing is an adventure, and reading should be, too!
Raw Charge.
by John Fontana on Nov 12, 2011 6:37 PM EST up reply actions
as a fan of US soccer
and a Southerner, I have similar problems with the common usage of the term
Heel for school, Vol for life!
Bolts, Preds, Canes (childhood team, home state team, hometown team). Canes mini-STH. Southern hockey solidarity!
by Incipient_Senescence on Nov 13, 2011 12:31 AM EST up reply actions
By that, do you mean that “Yankee” ought to be a specific insult referring to people from the region in the United States north of the Ohio River and east of the Mississippi river? An insult referring to their general rudeness and utterly mixed up priorities in life? As in, “don’t mind him, he’s a Yankee”.
Because if so, I have never in my life heard anything so preposterous! Bless your heart, you’re mixed up.
R.I.P. Belak, Rypien, Boogaard, Lokomotiv.
Part Predator, part Lightning.
First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then you win.
no, that's actually the very reason
that I have a problem with using it as a general term for an American and for the American soccer team.
Heel for school, Vol for life!
Bolts, Preds, Canes (childhood team, home state team, hometown team). Canes mini-STH. Southern hockey solidarity!
by Incipient_Senescence on Nov 13, 2011 11:17 AM EST up reply actions
not sure how those can be debated
I don’t like shootouts, but they sure didn’t kill anything
Heel for school, Vol for life!
Bolts, Preds, Canes (childhood team, home state team, hometown team). Canes mini-STH. Southern hockey solidarity!
by Incipient_Senescence on Nov 12, 2011 11:37 AM EST up reply actions
But lots of people were/are still saying that the shootout is ruining or killing hockey. Every single item on that list I drew up was fought by a lot of hockey people as meaning the death of hockey, yet they are all now considered integral to the game. People just assume the game has never changed or that it is essentially an offensively-oriented game and that’s just not true.
There was a time in the history of the NHL when goals per game averaged less than 3. And not just for a season, but for decades. We’ve changed the game before and to believe that what we have now is somehow sacred and unchanging is self-deluding.
R.I.P. Belak, Rypien, Boogaard, Lokomotiv.
Part Predator, part Lightning.
First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then you win.
that's what I meant to say
there were people who said that shootouts would kill hockey, but it’s hard to argue right now that they have. which makes them perfectly appropriate for your list.
Heel for school, Vol for life!
Bolts, Preds, Canes (childhood team, home state team, hometown team). Canes mini-STH. Southern hockey solidarity!
by Incipient_Senescence on Nov 12, 2011 11:52 AM EST up reply actions
Rec'd
What worries me—and I think it’s this worry that perpetuates the frustration about the whole thing—is the possibility for knee-jerk reactions by the league in the hopes of preventing boredom from setting in for the new NHL fan. That sort of knee-jerk reaction would be bad.
"The Revolution will be complete when the language is perfect"
- Smith in Orwell's 1984
Funny thing is
The intentional walk does suck and I’d like to see them award the batter third base because of how much it sucks.
The intentional foul in basketball where the last minute of every game draws out to a ten-minute affair is a big reason I can’t watch the sport.
I grew up playing soccer and still find myself turning off matches when the teams start diving too much.
I would hate to see penalties for “illegal defense” in hockey though. I don’t like the trap, but I’d hate a rule to get rid of it even more.
by J.J. from Kansas on Nov 13, 2011 9:20 PM EST reply actions
For me, the intentional fouling in basketball is the worst, as it almost always accomplishes nothing but delaying an inevitable outcome.
I believe if you’re up by ten or more and there’s less than a minute to play, if you’re intentionally fouled you should have the option of choosing between the two free throws or running five seconds off the clock.
by Clark J Brooks on Nov 16, 2011 11:37 AM EST up reply actions
























