A David's Lament: Has The Business Of Sports Cooled Our Love Affair With The Underdog?
"You guys will NEVER be on HBO!"
These were the last words from an obviously disappointed and possibly somewhat inebriated Washington Capitals fan before getting into a taxi cab outside of the restaurant across the street from the St. Pete Times Forum currently known as The Luxury Box (give it a week or two) after being swept out of the 2011 NHL Playoffs by the Tampa Bay Lightning.
At first I thought, what an odd thing to say. That's the best you got? I almost yelled, "Yeah, and we'll never host a Winter Classic either. Who cares?" I mean, after all, it's about winning championships, not booking TV appearances. Right?
Maybe, maybe not. Consider that the two most high-profile events the NHL offers, the Winter Classic and the Stanley Cup Finals, are intertwined in that every year, one team that participates in the Winter Classic makes it to the Stanley Cup Finals...until this year. Tampa Bay eliminated both the Pittsburgh Penguins and the Capitals, the two teams that sqaured off in the 2011 NHL Winter Classic, and were featured in "24/7", a documentary TV series on HBO leading up to the Winter Classic. You gotta figure at least a couple of people in the NHL marketing department aren't thrilled and may have muttered the exact same words as that frustrated Caps fan.
For better or for worse, we are of the 1st generation of sports fans to understand that sports are a business and that television is the engine that drives the train. We're as comfortable with discussing concepts like revenue sharing, labor negotiations, salary caps and the disparity between large and small markets as we are with Goals Against Average and Penalty Killing Percentage.
In a lot of ways, I'm thinking it's for worse. On one hand, it's good that we're all adults and it's healthy to understand that fun and games is actually Fun & Games ®. It's a good idea to be grounded in reality when teams start lobbying for new stadiums and such. On the other hand, I don't see why all the fun has to be sucked out of everything.
A guy I know in St. Louis, who seems to live for tormenting me about our local teams (probably because he's a Blues, Rams and Cardinals fan and inherently bitter...mostly about the Blues), posted this on my Facebook page after the Lightning completed the sweep the other night:
"Just what NBC had in mind when they signed a two billion dollar TV deal with the NHL.. A Vancouver-Tampa Cup final.."
I guess this is post-modern sports smack talk; he's got us skipping the conference finals...but somehow that's not a good thing. I never thought I'd say I miss the old-timey days when somebody would say our goalie sucks (whether or not a rational, fact-based argument either way could be made) but I do because I don't really know how I'm supposed to respond to something like this.
Am I supposed to feel bad because a corporation that can shell out billions of dollars for broadcast rights might not get the match-up that would allow them to recoup that money as fast as they'd like by charging beer distributors, auto manufacturers and fast food franchises the highest ad rates? Am I supposed to feel bad that my team doesn't exist for the sole purpose of being a sparring partner for teams in a small handful of other cities? Why should I, as a sports fan, care about any of that stuff? Why should any sports fan care about that stuff?
For that matter, whatever happened to rooting for the underdog? Not that everybody should become Tampa Bay Lightning fans or even see the Lightning as being in that role (they're a 5 seed; they didn't exactly back in with a losing record). But teams who are in good standing in the league (paid their franchise fees, attend all the meetings, etc.) that don't play in one of the larger cities shouldn't feel obligated to apologize for being successful, under any cirsumstances, and neither should their fans.
Call me old-fashioned but I'm too busy worrying about actual hockey injuries to Simon Gagne and Pavel Kubina to care about the possible hurt feelings of some television executive I've never even heard of. Lightning coach Guy Boucher has made frequent references to David and Goliath while his squad has advanced through the playoffs.
But all David had to worry about was slaying a giant, not Nielsen ratings and ad revenue.
40 comments
|
6 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Amen.
I'm in love with the Lightning, the Flyers are my fling and I have a crush on the Flyers fans.
Dare to follow my childish, biased, petty and cheesy alter ego. Go visit my website. I will keep you updated on every Simon injury.
American Cheese, B!tch! ... #1 mission? Kill Holmgren & Decapitate Kunitz.
by Katchis on May 7, 2011 2:37 AM EDT via mobile reply actions
I think your post is great, and I am concerned about the uneven marketing of the league as well.
Sure, Tampa may never host a Winter Classic (though what with the downtown ice skating rink it’s possible from a technical standpoint) but is it such a stretch to think Our Team couldn’t play in one? Inside your heart, you know the answer, too—yes; yes it is. Consider this: since the inception of the Winter Classic in 2008, only the Sabres, Red Wings, Flyers, Bruins, Capitals, Blackhawks and Penguins (twice) have played in it. What do each of those teams have in common—they are (with the exception of the Sabres and the Caps) some of the oldest franchises with some of the largest fan bases.
I guess it boils down to this: after the lockout, the NHL is just now beginning to re-emerge as a relevant sport, and the Winter Classic (and Heritage Classic) is one of their new brand marks as they increase revenue and expand fan base. I think they’ve done a good job overall, but are now facing the risk of overselling the big teams at the expense of the smaller markets—Tampa included. Messrs. Vinik’s and Yzerman’s goal of perpetual playoff apperances and success will make Tampa more relevant to the sports fan nation-wide, but that will take some time.
"They are uncanny. When they want to get a goal, it's like they just snap their fingers or hit a button. They just dial it up. You can see it. It's like they flip a switch. When they are down, it's just like they think, 'we know we are going to score.' I don't know what it is, it leaves you flabbergasted." - Mike Knuble, 3 May 2011
Don’t forget, there will be a national TV game on NBC the day after Thanksgiving starting in 2011. Why not Boston – Tampa right there?
Could already be predecided, however. But lots of games are traditionally played that Friday. Or, NBC may just arbitrarily pick one two weeks before. Actually, I think its the Rangers and New York city that will be due for the Winter Classic, which will probably now be a night game thanks to the Heinz Field one and may not be on New Years Fay either if the NFL decides to play its season.
It's always a great day or night for hockey - no matter the time or place!
Boston always plays at home at like noon that day, it’s the worst.
Hockey Blog Adventure: New Post: Round 1: NO HABS NO (I'm also on Twitter.) GO BRUINS! (and Wild!)
by Cornelius Hardenbergh on May 9, 2011 10:36 AM EDT up reply actions
What?
I’ve looked forward to that every year since I started having season tickets.
Love the noon time start.
The Bruins have been pretty awful in the afternoon recently, and it just seems too early for hockey.
Hockey Blog Adventure: New Post: Round 1: NO HABS NO (I'm also on Twitter.) GO BRUINS! (and Wild!)
by Cornelius Hardenbergh on May 9, 2011 11:46 AM EDT up reply actions
the Bolts had a noon game in Pittsburgh in the first round
I’ll just say that if we win them all 8-2, I won’t complain.
by Incipient_Senescence on May 9, 2011 11:47 AM EDT up reply actions
Too early?
Noon time start, done by three, and then it’s a day/night in Boston that starts at 3 p.m.
I see no issues.
just throws my whole day off is all. Plus, the rate of last-minute cancellations on me for day games is significantly higher.
Hockey Blog Adventure: New Post: Round 1: NO HABS NO (I'm also on Twitter.) GO BRUINS! (and Wild!)
by Cornelius Hardenbergh on May 9, 2011 11:56 AM EDT up reply actions
Excellent post! Its unfortunately true, instead of focusing on the underdog, commentators lament about the performance of the favorites.
Personally, I’m disappointed.
In the recent past rooting for the underdog was a given, it helped acquire new fans and build up the support for that team. Now the underdog is treated as unworthy, especially by some of the key commentators in the game. Listen to the NHL channel on XM/Sirius, until the other day the Lightning were an afterthought. Even coming back and winning the Pens series was focused on the Pens shortcomings and very little on the Bolts effort.
Now that the Bolts swept the Capitals the positive comments come out of the woodwork. I still hear “Those games are boring” from one of their most prolific commentators however.
Hopefully momentum will build, after all this is the 2nd successful playoff run for the Lightning in 7 years, not many teams match that.
A proud Panthers and Lightning ticket holder since 2011! Go Florida Hockey!
Tampa will always have these issues due to many factors (See the Rays), but winning, and lots of it, helps. I love hockey, but it’s fans are some of the worst…at least the old fuddy duddy pre San Jose expansion fans. They’ll never accept any southern teams outside of the Kings (Too important a market for anyone to ignore except the NFL).
Maybe the over promotion of Washington/Pittsburgh will help Tampa down the road. In baseball, all my friends up north root for Tampa because they’re sink and tired of the RED SOX / Yankees 24/7. The national media will always try to bury them when they have an offseason like the last, but the fans still look at the stnadings and see Tampa only 1 game out and #1 in the wild card.
As I said somewhere else, thank god for the internet. The national media still controls the narrative for lazy minds, but they can’t stop the growing plurality of opinions.
by BaronZ on May 7, 2011 11:58 AM EDT reply actions 1 recs
bout the Rays
they are tied for first with respect to games behind. the Wild Card should not even be discussed.
just like discussing a Tampa Bay-Vancouver finals is way premature. Heck, Vancouver isn’t even in their conference finals yet.
And to some extent in Hockey it’s “original 6 bias” and “warm climate derision”, but look at the teams who have won the Cup in the last decade. Quite a representation from warm climate teams. Not sure how long it takes to alter deeply held perceptions, but in time results will have to make an apt statement over biased thoughts.
Even as an outsider, I find the lack of ability to root for the underdog very perplexing.
As a Philadelphian, the perfect example for me comes from your own market. In 2008, it certainly felt like the entire national media was on the Rays bandwagon during the playoffs, even if they hurriedly jumped off once it was all over. ‘Small market team that had never even had a winning season before, now here they are in the World Series and they’re so dominant that they have to be the favorite in this series!’ I promise I’m not saying that to rub it in, I’m just trying to draw a parallel about how willing the media was to spin that arrangement into a case of rooting for the small market financial underdog against the larger TV market. They could easily find an effective way to market your team this year, as I can think of multiple options myself.
You deserve whatever exposure you get from your success right now, because the current NHL mentality is not to give you any for free (which isn’t fair). But if they’re going to insist on trying to make the ‘southern markets’ work, they need to give you your due when you earn it. And for the record, even without the spectacular nature of the last two weeks or so, I think you guys are doing just fine.
I remember a post the NHL made on their Facbook page after the sweep
It asked, “How do you think Capitals fans are feeling right now?” Well, what about Lightning fans? You know, the team that actually won?
They’re making it seem like the Capitals lost this series instead of giving any credit to the Bolts for winning it. While that may be partially due to the fact that the Caps were a 1 seed and the Lightning a 5 seed, we had 103 points this season, only 4 behind Washington. Even casually, there is obvious favoritism with teams like the Caps and Pens, not too different from the Red Sox and Yankees in baseball.
Also, did anyone notice that the two main teams that were featured in commercials for the NHL (Washington with the “Ovechtrick” and Philly with “the undefeated season”) were swept out of the playoffs?
well, the Caps did lose the series
They were not a fraction of what I expected. For the record, however, I did not expect the Caps to roll the Bolts – the teams were pretty close in regular season achievement, and I thought the Bolts could win a long series. I never expected a sweep for either team. That the Bolts did sweep speaks to me that the Caps tanked.
Now it’s the big bad Bruins, and if the Bolts do well we can expect “what went wrong for the Bruins”, and if the Bruins prevail it’ll be “Boston was just too much for the Lightning”.
But looking at the regular season records, I see both teams with identical 46-25-11 records. Boston’s had a better goal differential, but how does that explain the Bolts goals for/goals against in the playoffs? The Bolts had problems with giving up shorties all regular season, but in the playoffs how has that worked out?
As the OP states, it’s all about expectation based on market size. We saw it in 2004 also. There was “no way” the Lightning could win a 7 game series against the big bad Flyers.
Flyers. Flames.
"They are uncanny. When they want to get a goal, it's like they just snap their fingers or hit a button. They just dial it up. You can see it. It's like they flip a switch. When they are down, it's just like they think, 'we know we are going to score.' I don't know what it is, it leaves you flabbergasted." - Mike Knuble, 3 May 2011
I think you meant Flyers
The Flames weren’t that big of a favorite, were they?
by Incipient_Senescence on May 8, 2011 9:19 PM EDT up reply actions
the flames? Nope
The Flames left the media at as much of a loss as TB making the finals
Typing is an adventure, and reading should be, too!
Raw Charge.
by John Fontana on May 8, 2011 11:59 PM EDT via mobile up reply actions
that's how I remembered it too
just making sure
by Incipient_Senescence on May 9, 2011 12:16 AM EDT up reply actions
In any other year, the Flames would have been the underdog team going intot he finals. They ran through Vancouver, Detroit and San Jose to make it to the Stanley Cup Finals.
The Punditry being thrown for a loss was, again, the result of their own fixation on a limited number of teams. Sutter vs. Tortorella was a solid coaching match-up, and the finals maked the end of an era (or two, if you include broadcast-wise) for the NHL.
Typing is an adventure, and reading should be, too!
Raw Charge.
No, edski's right, we played the Flyers...
We played the Flyer’s to 7 in the ECF before playing the Flames in the SCF. And yes, even though we were the number 1 seed, there was “no way” we could beat the Flyers in a 7 game series…obviously there was.
I was really hoping the Flyer’s would take the series against Boston…Tampa has a knack of going through Philly to get to the big games: think Eagles and Flyers…Super Bowl and Stanley Cup. Too bad the Rays spoiled our trifecta of all Tampa Championships using Philly as the door mat.
Also, did anyone notice that the two main teams that were featured in commercials for the NHL (Washington with the "Ovechtrick" and Philly with "the undefeated season") were swept out of the playoffs?
The same jinx was also associated with being on the cover of the Hockey News before the trade deadline. If you were on the cover in January, you were traded in February.
Don’t worry. Win the Cup and you be seen everywhere. Make the finals and you will be remembered. Look at Detroit, Chicago and Pittsburgh.
I do agree, sports is a business, the business needs to maximize revenue, etc., but there is much, much more to the NHL than Crosby and Ovechkin. The marketers and sponsors will learn this really quick.
Besides – ever wonder why in the playoffs the NHL doesn’t do #1 vs. #16 anymore? It’s sure not the fear of travel, it’s more like the perceived fear of a San Jose-Vancouver final.
Food for thought.
It's always a great day or night for hockey - no matter the time or place!
I’ve been joking about that because of you since January. So remember that. If it happens, I said it first! ;o)
The ways of Jedi Master Yzerman are not the ways of others.
Raw Charge, an SBN Tampa Bay Lightning community. Follow me on Twitter: @dagmar27.
by Cassie McClellan on May 7, 2011 6:37 PM EDT up reply actions
Seconded!
Or thirded, if you count Cassie’s post as a vote. :-)
"They are uncanny. When they want to get a goal, it's like they just snap their fingers or hit a button. They just dial it up. You can see it. It's like they flip a switch. When they are down, it's just like they think, 'we know we are going to score.' I don't know what it is, it leaves you flabbergasted." - Mike Knuble, 3 May 2011
nah
Hockey Blog Adventure: New Post: Round 1: NO HABS NO (I'm also on Twitter.) GO BRUINS! (and Wild!)
by Cornelius Hardenbergh on May 8, 2011 10:38 AM EDT up reply actions
I think you’re biased, sir. ;o)
The ways of Jedi Master Yzerman are not the ways of others.
Raw Charge, an SBN Tampa Bay Lightning community. Follow me on Twitter: @dagmar27.
by Cassie McClellan on May 8, 2011 10:03 PM EDT up reply actions
Oh, like you’re not
Hockey Blog Adventure: New Post: Round 1: NO HABS NO (I'm also on Twitter.) GO BRUINS! (and Wild!)
by Cornelius Hardenbergh on May 9, 2011 10:42 AM EDT up reply actions
Of course I am, but I’m supposed to be. Where are you posting at? :oD
The ways of Jedi Master Yzerman are not the ways of others.
Raw Charge, an SBN Tampa Bay Lightning community. Follow me on Twitter: @dagmar27.
by Cassie McClellan on May 9, 2011 10:44 AM EDT up reply actions
Just because I’m posting on a lightning blog I have to root for them? I better go, then.
Hockey Blog Adventure: New Post: Round 1: NO HABS NO (I'm also on Twitter.) GO BRUINS! (and Wild!)
by Cornelius Hardenbergh on May 9, 2011 10:48 AM EDT up reply actions
Nah. I’m just giving you a hard time. Hence the smiley faces. ;o)
The ways of Jedi Master Yzerman are not the ways of others.
Raw Charge, an SBN Tampa Bay Lightning community. Follow me on Twitter: @dagmar27.
by Cassie McClellan on May 9, 2011 11:32 AM EDT up reply actions
I’m kind of pulling for Bruins/Sharks myself.
Get a chance to beat Thornton in the Finals, yeah, that’d be great.
I’m hoping for a Bruins/anybody series. Plenty of storylines to be had with any opponent.
Hockey Blog Adventure: New Post: Round 1: NO HABS NO (I'm also on Twitter.) GO BRUINS! (and Wild!)
by Cornelius Hardenbergh on May 9, 2011 11:45 AM EDT up reply actions
If the Caps were Goliath to the Lightning's David
Then the Neilsen ratings and ad revenue are, hopefully, Saul.
Like the write-up
And looking forward to this series guys, going to be a good one.
Voted on your fan poll, Bruins in 6 I say.
Hopefully the schedule comes out soon and I can see if a flight down for game 3,4, or 6 would make sense.
The really scary thing:
The entire league stands to lose a lot of money when small markets win, that’s why it’s important to have consistent officiating as inconsistent officiating can be seen as league intervention in the outcome of a series. And no, consistently inconsistent officiating doesn’t count.

























