Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Trent Richardson Interviews Fellow Brown Brandon Weeden

Tuesdays with Dani: Post-ASG Links

It's been a week without hockey. I'm not sure how you got through it, but personally I watched hours upon hours of glorious tennis, but there was still this nagging feeling of something missing.

If you did catch the skills competition, perhaps you caught Steven Stamkos going three for three on the shootout elimination challenge to win the event. Since he has gone 0-for-10 during the shootout the past two seasons, it should make you say "Stammer, why can't we see this more often?"

Here are your links for the week:

Your Lightning links:

The rest of your links after the jump...

Star-divide

Your links from around the NHL:

Video of the week: Joey the Junior Reporter interviews players before the ASG competition

Comment 12 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

I think some press-box time for Connolly would fair well. Kid has what it takes, just missing some of the little things. Gripping the stick tight when shooting, stick on the ice in front of the net, I’ve noticed a few times this year when Connolly is in front of the net where it seems has has froze up or tried to shoot and fanned on it. I’m not trying to harp on the kid because he is looking great, but to get results he needs to fix the little things. A little time in the press-box can do a lot of good (aka the article; Tyler Seguin).

"We're fighting, You can't say we weren't fighting." - Guy Boucher after Tampa Bay Lightning loses third-period lead again in 4-2 defeat at Ottawa Senators.

by Killhowe on Jan 31, 2012 12:53 PM EST reply actions  

This article on Guy Boucher just came out

And it sheds a lot of light on some of the things we’ve talked about at Raw Charge in the past two months or so.

http://www.nhl.com/ice/news.htm?id=614521&utm_source=dlvr.it&utm_medium=twitter

R.I.P. Belak, Rypien, Boogaard, Lokomotiv.
"You don’t motivate people; you activate something in them that already exists." -Guy Boucher

by CAustin on Jan 31, 2012 1:12 PM EST reply actions  

Can't Have Your Cake And Eat It Too

First and foremost, I am solidly behind the movement to recognize bloggers as bona fide reporters. Secondly, I’ve not read Winters’ response.

That out of the way, if “Pass It Too Bulis” does deserve the nom d’guerre of “media,” then they need to act and handle themselves accordingly. I assumed Winter’s recognition of the “media” status would have been seen as honorific and legitmizing the efforts of “Pass It To Bulis.” Bloggers of news sites are clammoring for recognition of the title “media” and/or “reporters.” To label them something else is detrimental to the movement.

Additionally, if they’re maintaining their “humor only” meme, they need to come out as such, for in my opinion, to play both sides does the “bloggers as media” movement a disservice.

"Freedom is the freedom to say two plus two equals four. If that is granted all else will follow."
- Smith in Orwell's 1984

by MTBoltFan on Jan 31, 2012 1:27 PM EST reply actions  

Wagner’s response on Backhand Shelf was basically, “yeah I screwed up because I was thinking of myself like an independent, non-mainstream writer who wouldn’t ever have access anyway. I’m going to have to do it differently from now on.”

To me there are other ethics questions that he didn’t address in that article (I haven’t read the PITB article yet). I don’t think that bloggers really consider themselves media first. I think that most of them (myself included) consider themselves fans first. Should sports reporters (and, by extension, bloggers with standards) be asked to be impartial? Lots aren’t. Do/should they have loyalty to the team or the players or the fans or to some abstract ideal of the Truth? Given that there are a lot of writers who have zero access to the franchise in any capacity, how should they be asked to have the same standards as beat reporters from established media outlets?

It’s a complicated issue and I’m glad he brought it up.

R.I.P. Belak, Rypien, Boogaard, Lokomotiv.
"You don’t motivate people; you activate something in them that already exists." -Guy Boucher

by CAustin on Jan 31, 2012 2:46 PM EST up reply actions  

But bloggers everywhere—not all, but the ones interested in actual news—are wanting to be recognized as legitimate media. The fact that PITB is often on the Vancouver paper’s website further perpetuates the idea of PITB being recognized as media. PITB either needs to embrace fully the “media” aspect of blogging, or put a disclaimer on the blog that makes it clear to the reader what is to follow.

"Freedom is the freedom to say two plus two equals four. If that is granted all else will follow."
- Smith in Orwell's 1984

by MTBoltFan on Jan 31, 2012 3:00 PM EST up reply actions  

I beg to differ….as a blogger, I don’t necessarily want to be known as legitimate media. Honest. I am very happy to just make comments on news articles that reporters write.

As for PITB they got picked up by the Vancouver Sun as part of a feature blog for the paper because they draw in hits. Both the two local papers here in Vancouver (Vancouver Sun and The Province) both have in house bloggers. PITB is one, The Province has Legion of Blog as theirs (used to be Kurtenblog). They weren’t hired as media, though they get exposure since they are linked through the paper website

by Dani Toth on Jan 31, 2012 3:23 PM EST up reply actions  

I know not all bloggers, Dani…hence my lead-in:

But bloggers everywhere—not all, but the ones interested in actual news

All I’m saying is if that’s the case (of PITB not written by “media”), the paper needs to install a disclaimer stating as such, or else more people are going to think less of the Sun and its reporters if more instances like this emerge.

Furthermore, this (and any related) issue could do damage to the “bloggers as media” movement—that’s perhaps a more concise way of saying what I’m trying to say. :-)

"Freedom is the freedom to say two plus two equals four. If that is granted all else will follow."
- Smith in Orwell's 1984

by MTBoltFan on Jan 31, 2012 3:39 PM EST up reply actions  

It’s not that clear cut to me. I don’t see the distinction between “media” (by which I assume you mean folks professionally writing or producing broadcast content) and “blogging” as being that clear. PITB does a lot of humor and sarcasm, but they do a lot of other things, too. This article that sparked the controversy was in no way a humorous article.

I don’t think that they ought to have to choose between “blogging” and “news.” I think that “new media” (aka the internet) allows for a site to do both. The question as I understood it from reading the original Wagner article. the agent’s response, and Wagner’s article on BS was that he proposed a theory about events in Vancouver and published that theory (like a blogger would) without calling anyone to get their quotes. It wasn’t that he didn’t think they’d have something worth saying but that he wasn’t used to having anyone be willing to talk to him. He thought of himself as an outsider.

I do think that there are questions raised about what bloggers do and how they do it, but there really isn’t a sharp distinction between what PITB does and what someone like Eliotte Friedman or Bob Mckenzie or even our own beat reporters in the Tampa are do. PITB does have the latitude to be silly where Friedman (or other mainstream media guys) may not, but that’s not all they do. And as long as Bruce Garrioch is writing for a newspaper, and Ken Campbell is making up crap at The Hockey News, and so on, the line between blogging and reporting is going to be blurry.

R.I.P. Belak, Rypien, Boogaard, Lokomotiv.
"You don’t motivate people; you activate something in them that already exists." -Guy Boucher

by CAustin on Jan 31, 2012 3:28 PM EST up reply actions  

So if a site can do both, let me give you a hypothetical situation.

If I run a blog, and am a credentialled reporter through that blog, what are my readers to think if I run a bit of sarcasm or satire without disclosing the humorous intent at the outset of the article? I’ll tell you what would happen: my readers would take that as a serious article, and call for me to be accountable—to say nothing of my reputation as a journalist being damaged.

PITB needs to make it clear to everyone they aren’t related to the paper—I didn’t realize that, and certainly thought the Vancouver Sun hosting of the blog made it a legitimate news outlet.

"Freedom is the freedom to say two plus two equals four. If that is granted all else will follow."
- Smith in Orwell's 1984

by MTBoltFan on Jan 31, 2012 3:43 PM EST up reply actions  

If you post a sarcastic article that people can’t tell is a sarcastic article, you have issues getting your sarcasm across. Puck Daddy is a great example of what I’m talking about. They do both, they are credentialed and respected reporters, they rarely get their signals crossed on whether they’re joking or serious, and if they do, readers set folks straight real fast. It’s very possible to do both and I’ve always found PITB to manage that very well. I don’t think they need to warn people to think before they read. And like I say, that sort of warning is irrelevant to this dust-up anyway, since it wasn’t a sarcastic article.

And FWIW, some people don’t know that the Onion isn’t a straight news organization.

R.I.P. Belak, Rypien, Boogaard, Lokomotiv.
"You don’t motivate people; you activate something in them that already exists." -Guy Boucher

by CAustin on Jan 31, 2012 3:55 PM EST up reply actions  

I know all too personally the problems involved with internet/email sarcasm and misunderstanding thereof—there are times I’ve had problems getting my sarcasm across even while posting here on Raw Charge.

It’s a problem on the rise with the increase in nonpersonal interactions brought on by SNS and blog use, and one any news organization needs to handle delicately.

Don’t know if you intended this, but I for one didn’t know PITB wasn’t a Sun column. Sure, I knew it was humorous (well, that was the intent, any way), but the hosting of the blog by the Sun lends implied consent and approval by the Sun. Who else gets consent and approval from a paper other than media?

The relationship (or lack thereof) needs to be disclosed up front. That’s what the disclaimer needs to state—not necessarily the sarcastic or humorous content (that was just an example).

"Freedom is the freedom to say two plus two equals four. If that is granted all else will follow."
- Smith in Orwell's 1984

by MTBoltFan on Jan 31, 2012 4:12 PM EST up reply actions  

My problem with this that “the relationship” is so undefined that it’s really not clear what it means. The banner on every page of PITB identifies it as a “blog” but that means so many different things to so many different people. Nowhere did Wagner claim to be a reporter, but despite him outright calling himself a blogger, people assumed he was a reporter.

The point is that no one knows what the relationship really is or how it affects his work, not even the guy writing the article. There’s not a whole lot a statement at the top of the page is going to do to rectify that.

R.I.P. Belak, Rypien, Boogaard, Lokomotiv.
"You don’t motivate people; you activate something in them that already exists." -Guy Boucher

by CAustin on Jan 31, 2012 4:46 PM EST up reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

"The static cling that brings Tampa Bay Lightning fans together", SB Nation's Bolts community is your place for news, commentary and camaraderie.

Pages

Posting Guidelines on Raw Charge

Lined-Up Update (2010 off-season)

Raw Charge apparel

Featured Poll

Poll
20th Anniversary Season poll: Favorite Tampa Bay Lightning logo?

  51 votes | Results

Raw Charge on the Web


Raw Charge on Tumblr

eXTReMe Tracker

Managing Editors

2011-03-06_12_small John Fontana

Imag0026_small Cassie McClellan

Writing Staff

Small Dani Toth

Ads_small Tina Robinson

Beardweekone_small Matt Amos

Photo_small Clark J Brooks

Snowman_in_net_small CAustin

Small shawndubstep