Question of the Week: The Story of 2011
The clock struck midnight, the calendar turned, and we finally put 2011 to bed. In many ways, 2011 was one of the most trying hockey years I've ever experienced, so I was a bit glad to see it go. Because, essentially, lots of bad stuff happened in the 365 days between January 1, 2011 and Saturday, December 31st, 2011. The new year symbolically gives a chance at a new beginning.
Starting from the very first day of the 2011, the hockey world seemed to reel from story to story--player safety, bad refereeing, failing franchises, relocation, realignment. The fighting question, the depression question, the steroid question, the concussion question. And deaths. Deaths from cancer, from overdoses, from suicides, from plane crashes. For much of 2011, hockey hurt.
Out of all of that, what do we take away? What's the most important story of the 2011 calendar year? I guess that depends on what you hope will get fixed. For me, I wish I could say that the Lightning's Cinderella run to Game 7 of the Eastern Conference Final was the most important story. But it's not the one that affected my life the most.
The story that affected me the most was the death of Wade Belak. Because he was someone who had an impact on my life; because he died so tragically at a moment when everything seemed to be going his way; because we learned so much about the price he paid to do what he did only when it was too late to show our support; because he was funny and loving and smart and sweet and the universe made him feel alone when he wasn't.
Beeker's death affected me more than any other story and changed my relationship with hockey. I still love the game, but I love it with a more complex emotion than before. And I can't ever be innocent about it again. I miss that.
Tina Robinson - Staff Writer
To me, the most important story was not any particular game or happening, but the large number of concussions the hockey world has dealt with this season, and with the recent deaths of several "enforcer" types the renewed concerns about the long term impact of blows to the head. I know several of the deaths were ruled suicides and others were drug/alcohol related, but the debate continues about whether the job these guys did on the ice affected their health (both physical and mental) and were additional factors in their untimely deaths.
The league is trying to become more vigilant (with varying degrees of success) about policing dangerous or questionable hits with more suspensions being handed out this year and there have been renewed calls by some to ban fighting in hockey altogether, but I doubt that will ever happen.
All of this has caused teams to be a lot more cautious about how they handle a player with a confirmed (or even suspected) concussion, but it is ultimately going to be the players responsibility for reducing head injuries by staying away from the "dirty" (i.e. intentional) hits and being more aware of each other on the ice. This won't stop head injuries and concussions of course, but I think it would help to decrease the number.
John Fontana - Managing Editor / Raw Charge
The keyword here is "important". As we can say different things are the "biggest" news tsory of the past year (the multiple deaths of the summer of 2011, Sidney Crosby's concussion from January 2011, realignment, relocation, etc)...
But I think what was very important to the game, and what has failed, was Colin Campbell stepping aside in the role of discipline and Brendan Shanahan taking over. The importance being that, with thanks to Tyler Dellow's investigative work from the year before, an out-of-touch NHL executive in a position of power was pressured to moved out of that position. I say that it's failed because of the inconsistency that has remained under Shanahan, and the fact Campbell still has say and sway on discipline and oversees on-ice officials, who keep seemingly, getting worse and worse with their own inconsistencies.So, in the end, my choice is the continuing failure of discipline and enforcement in the NHL is the most important story from the past year. Shanahan is a new face, and explains his reasoning to the public... But that's just about as inconsistent as the officiating of a NHL game.
Matt Amos - Staff Writer / Don't Trade Vinny
Unfortunately, I don't know that it can be narrowed down to just one.
The bottom line for me is that 2011 was probably the worst calendar year for hockey in my lifetime. And I guess that, is a story in and of itself in a way.
There just simply isn't anything positive going on in the league right now. The hockey community is still reeling from the summer tragedies, concussions and head injuries are rampant, discipline - both on the ice from inconsistent officiating and off the ice in the supplemental form - continue to be an absolute joke of a mess of a disaster of a train wreck, a few teams still haven't secured themselves financially, the opportunity to jump to the spotlight with other sports' labor issues was basically shrugged at by league brass, and now apparently racial and sexual preference bigotry is on the rise.
It's gut-check time, NHL. Figure it out.
Clark Brooks - Staff Writer / Ridiculously Inconsistent Trickle of Consciousness
I'd have to say the most important story of 2011 was the announcement of the re-alignment plan, as it will significantly impact every single team in the league. Some for better or for worse, but everybody is going to be affected one way or another. If the NFL were to undergo a similarly drastic change, certain cable channels would still be devoting around-the-clock coverage to it now.
Cassie McClellan - Managing Editor / Raw Charge
I thought about it for a long time, but I couldn't decide between any of the big stories. A lot happened this year, and a lot of it was very important. One thing didn't stand out to me above the five or so that dominated the year. So I think I'll take a pass on this.
21 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
One last hockey tragedy for 2011
If you haven’t heard about Jack Jablonski, you will. Jack or “Jabber” is a 16 year old hockey player out of Minnesota who was paralyzed in game, during a holiday tournament last Friday. Hope to see a post about it on all SBN pages sooner, than later. Was going to do one here myself… but feel this should be left to better writers/admins, who can do a more productive job and help spread the word far and wide…on front page.
From what I’ve read thus far.. their is yet to be a direct page for donations to Jack & Family. But one is in the process and will be posted here, when complete.
Here are some links on the incident:
http://sports.yahoo.com/nhl/blog/puck_daddy/post/How-you-can-support-Jack-Jablonski-paralyzed-pr?urn=nhl-wp21564
http://www.pensionplanpuppets.com/2012/1/4/2681913/donate-to-jack-jablonski
http://www.hockeywilderness.com/2012/1/3/2678570/hockey-community-rallies-behind-injured-high-school-hockey-player
Apparently.. donations made to the caringbridge.com page do not go directly to family, still a great organization, none the less. Good to see so much support from around our beloved hockey world. Thoughts go out to Jack & Family/friends. I don’t even know what to say, other than, their is always new hope with these injuries everyday. Get well soon Jabs!!!
"WINGnut--BOLThead"
Let's GO..Wings, Tigers, Lions, Wolverines (oh my!) & Bolts!!!! (RIP Cory Smoot aka Flattus Maximus of GWAR)
by Let's JOE WINGS-BOLTS on Jan 5, 2012 11:59 AM EST reply actions
When I first heard the name.. couldn’t help but think of our own “Jabber” aka Pat Jablonski (former Lightning goalie) Guessing no relation, as last I heard, Pat still lives in Tampa area.
"WINGnut--BOLThead"
Let's GO..Wings, Tigers, Lions, Wolverines (oh my!) & Bolts!!!! (RIP Cory Smoot aka Flattus Maximus of GWAR)
by Let's JOE WINGS-BOLTS on Jan 5, 2012 12:04 PM EST up reply actions
Hey Joe...
First of all, flattery will get you everywhere.
Secondly, we’re fan driven, so your wish is our command. I will work on a story about this when I get home later tonight and hopefully publish it some time tomorrow (Friday). I have a little background on it and just happen to have a connection via some friends in Minneapolis.
by Clark Brooks on Jan 5, 2012 12:56 PM EST up reply actions
Thank You Clark!
To be honest.. was a bit surprised not to have seen something about it on here sooner. With that said.. I was only made aware of Jack’s story yesterday and the incident occurred on Dec. 30th. So apparently the word is still being spread and hope it continues to do so. Jabber & family can use and deserves all the support they can get, at a time like this.
Not to mention, knowledge and education is key.. when it comes to any type of prevention, to help keep incidents like this out of hockey/sports. The more people, players, coaches who know.. the better. Look forward to the post, thanks again!!
"WINGnut--BOLThead"
Let's GO..Wings, Tigers, Lions, Wolverines (oh my!) & Bolts!!!! (RIP Cory Smoot aka Flattus Maximus of GWAR)
by Let's JOE WINGS-BOLTS on Jan 5, 2012 2:11 PM EST up reply actions
You're welcome!
Unfortunately, it’s not going up on Friday though. It’s in progress, but I want to give Lightning players a chance to chime in (since we’re a Lightning blog, after all) and I can’t do that until they come home.
by Clark J Brooks on Jan 5, 2012 11:18 PM EST up reply actions
Awesome!! Great idea… sure it will be well worth the wait, as always.
"WINGnut--BOLThead"
Let's GO..Wings, Tigers, Lions, Wolverines (oh my!) & Bolts!!!! (RIP Cory Smoot aka Flattus Maximus of GWAR)
by Let's JOE WINGS-BOLTS on Jan 9, 2012 9:18 AM EST up reply actions
Most Memorable to Me
The playoff run
Growing up in the Northwest, I didn’t witness a lot of post-season success in the teams I followed. Never before last year had I witnessed in person a playoff game—in any sport. Never before last year had I witnessed in person a series-sweeping victory.
"The Revolution will be complete when the language is perfect"
- Smith in Orwell's 1984
Not to nit-pick, but not memorable/b>. We’re talking IMPORTANT. Something that is beyond a moment. A game, a series, even the playoffs didn’t have an effect on the entire sport…
Typing is an adventure, and reading should be, too!
Sasquatch, Yeti, The Loch Ness Monster, Evan Oberg - legends that may or may not be real
Raw Charge.
“Important” is subjective, though. A story can be important to one person because of its effects on them. Maybe seeing those games affected Cory in some way he hasn’t told us about yet (hint, hint). I know that without that playoff run, I probably wouldn’t have started contributing here at RC.
When I chose my “most important story,” I went with the personal. I don’t think that Beeker’s death alone had a great impact on the hockey world as a whole. If he had been the only player to die this summer under tragic circumstances, it wouldn’t have become much of a story. You can’t say that much has changed because of his death. But it had an enormous impact on me and how I feel about the players, the league, and the sport. So it was important. I left the wording vague specifically to try to catch that dynamic.
R.I.P. Belak, Rypien, Boogaard, Lokomotiv.
Rakastan suuria maalivahteja Skandinaviasta.
Love is but a song we sing And fear's the way we die.
I think John means relevant to the entire hockey community and not just to Lightning fans. ;o)
"You don't have enough talent to win on talent alone." -Herb Brooks
Raw Charge, an SBN Tampa Bay Lightning community. Follow me on Twitter: @dagmar27.
by Cassie McClellan on Jan 5, 2012 2:44 PM EST up reply actions
It doesn’t have to be, though. I’d just as soon allow people to make a case for why a story was important to them. Then we can tell them why they’re wrong. ;-)
R.I.P. Belak, Rypien, Boogaard, Lokomotiv.
Rakastan suuria maalivahteja Skandinaviasta.
Love is but a song we sing And fear's the way we die.
Who said it was wrong? John was just trying to clarify the question as he saw it. There are no ‘right’ answers as it’s just all perspective, anyways.
"You don't have enough talent to win on talent alone." -Herb Brooks
Raw Charge, an SBN Tampa Bay Lightning community. Follow me on Twitter: @dagmar27.
by Cassie McClellan on Jan 5, 2012 3:43 PM EST up reply actions
Wasn’t it CAustin who wrote the post and therefore asked the question anyways? And I’d say witnessing your first playoff game is pretty damn important.
"WINGnut--BOLThead"
Let's GO..Wings, Tigers, Lions, Wolverines (oh my!) & Bolts!!!! (RIP Cory Smoot aka Flattus Maximus of GWAR)
by Let's JOE WINGS-BOLTS on Jan 5, 2012 3:34 PM EST up reply actions
oops.. for got my ; )
"WINGnut--BOLThead"
Let's GO..Wings, Tigers, Lions, Wolverines (oh my!) & Bolts!!!! (RIP Cory Smoot aka Flattus Maximus of GWAR)
by Let's JOE WINGS-BOLTS on Jan 5, 2012 3:36 PM EST up reply actions
It’s important to an individual, certainly, but not necessarily to the entire hockey community. I’m not belittling the experience – I’ve never been to an NHL playoff game myself – just explaining the focus of the question as I perceived it. As I said above, this isn’t a question with a ‘right’ answer. :o)
"You don't have enough talent to win on talent alone." -Herb Brooks
Raw Charge, an SBN Tampa Bay Lightning community. Follow me on Twitter: @dagmar27.
by Cassie McClellan on Jan 5, 2012 3:45 PM EST up reply actions
After reading the staff’s picks, it seemed the definition of “important” was closely aligned with “memorable.”
My bad.
"The Revolution will be complete when the language is perfect"
- Smith in Orwell's 1984
You’re fine. :o)
"You don't have enough talent to win on talent alone." -Herb Brooks
Raw Charge, an SBN Tampa Bay Lightning community. Follow me on Twitter: @dagmar27.
by Cassie McClellan on Jan 6, 2012 8:26 AM EST up reply actions
?
Shanahan is a new face, and explains his reasoning to the public… But that’s just about as inconsistent as the officiating of a NHL game.
off the ice in the supplemental form – continue to be an absolute joke of a mess of a disaster of a train wreck
How so? How can you say it’s failed, when it’s only just began? I think we’re leaps and bounds ahead of where I thought we’d be, this time last year. Mainly because of Shanahan’s huge HUGE role. Yes, players are still getting injured. Yes, the officiating is still awful. Still though, we’ve made some amazing progress when it comes to supplemental discipline and they way in which it’s handled. Don’t think their has been one video where I didn’t understand or somewhat agree with the outcome. Only small things, like say the length of suspension, etc. Regardless.. for the first time in a loooong time, after years of going backwards, we’re actually making progress on the matter. The league (like the Bolts) won’t change or fix itself overnight. It’s a process… that has to start somewhere.
"WINGnut--BOLThead"
Let's GO..Wings, Tigers, Lions, Wolverines (oh my!) & Bolts!!!! (RIP Cory Smoot aka Flattus Maximus of GWAR)
by Let's JOE WINGS-BOLTS on Jan 5, 2012 2:32 PM EST reply actions
I can't answer for John or Matt, but I'm getting frustrated, too.
It seems like what started off promising in the preseason has devolved into another “Wheel of Justice” thing sometimes. It’s still very tough to know ahead of time what’s permissible and what isn’t. (And as long as Shanahan uses the “that kind of player” logic it’s going to stay that way.)
Perhaps the perceived inconsistency is a matter mostly of communicating what’s going into these decisions. Perhaps it isn’t. But right now it looks like players get suspended for their reputation first and their actions second. There seems to be a lot of transparency, but it’s still “guess the suspension” because no one knows what’s going to factor in except: injury, contact with the head, and players’ histories. Everything else gets thrown out there and we wait to see what’s gonna happen.
R.I.P. Belak, Rypien, Boogaard, Lokomotiv.
Rakastan suuria maalivahteja Skandinaviasta.
Love is but a song we sing And fear's the way we die.
Doesn’t a “that kind of player logic” include “players’ histories” as a deciding factor? Just as “players’ histories” as a deciding factor, fall under the “that kind of player logic?” Much as it may suck sometimes, a players history has to be considered. Just as it does in any type of justice system.
The only deciding factor I have any problem with is “injury” …Just too many what-ifs come into play. What if injured player A, is in better or worse shape, than injured player B..on similar infractions? Or if he has a better knowledge of the game to not get himself clobbered aka keeping his head up? Does it make the play any less dangerous, just because player A/B was or wasn’t prepared? And that’s just one part of it.
"WINGnut--BOLThead"
Let's GO..Wings, Tigers, Lions, Wolverines (oh my!) & Bolts!!!! (RIP Cory Smoot aka Flattus Maximus of GWAR)
by Let's JOE WINGS-BOLTS on Jan 5, 2012 3:24 PM EST up reply actions
There's a difference between history and reputation .
There’s a player’s history as defined by the CBA (fine or suspension within 18 months) and there’s “he’s known for playing like that even when he hasn’t been suspended.” The difference between Tootoo and Booth was that Booth snowed the goalie and “isn’t that kind of guy” while Toots, who hadn’t had supplementary discipline for 4 years, has a reputation as a cheap hitter. Both guys ran into the goalie, but Booth was given credit for “trying to stop” while Toots wasn’t given credit for trying to avoid a collision. Toots was suspended 2 games. Booth wasn’t even knocked with a fine.
R.I.P. Belak, Rypien, Boogaard, Lokomotiv.
Rakastan suuria maalivahteja Skandinaviasta.
Love is but a song we sing And fear's the way we die.

by 






















