Analyzing the Tampa Bay Lightning: Corsi Ratings

How good is your favorite top line, really?

Conventional stats such as goals, assists, and plus/minus ratings don't factor into the computations of the impact a hot (or cold) goalie can have on the bottom line. Who's really performing? How do we measure a players worth when they are shut out some nights? This is where a Corsi rating really shows it's value.

To the uninitiated, a Corsi rating adds shots on goal, blocked shots, and missed shots taken by both teams while any (or every) given player is on the ice. The amount of shots taken is indicative of time spent in the opposing zone, showing puck possession.

Further explanation and current Tampa Bay roster after the jump.

If on some night Ryan Malone is on the ice for 22 minutes, the shots tallied for each team during his TOI is used to calculate his Corsi value. Tampa Bay gets 8 shots on goal, had 3 shots blocked against, and missed 6 more. Toronto takes 6 shots on goal, has 3 shots blocked and missed 4, just during Malone's ice time. Add each variable, (8+3+6=17) - (6+3+4=13) = 4. Malone's Corsi value for the night is plus-four.

For computing Corsi over a season, it's more plausible to use a decimal instead of an integer. So in our test case, 17+13=30, so 17/30 = .567. Pretty high, right? It was probably a Lightning win. The thing is, when we use a larger sample size, say 69 games (minus injuries), we can get a much better picture on who is really getting it done for the Lightning more nights than not. With that in mind, here is your current Tampa Bay Lightning roster:

Brandon Segal .600
Marc-Andre Bergeron .523
Bruno Gervais .514
Teddy Purcell .505
Ryan Shannon .497
Steven Stamkos .494
Tim Wallace .488
Ryan Malone .483
Victor Hedman .483
Mike Commodore .483
Vincent LeCavalier .482
Brendan Mikkelson .478
Brett Connolly .477
Martin St. Louis. 471
Eric Brewer .455
Brett Clark .453
Tom Pyatt .452
Dana Tyrell .449
Nate Thompson .444
Brian Lee .436
Adam Hall .434
J.T. Wyman .428
Keith Aulie .398

It's my opinion that Corsi reflects favorably on better players, especially over a larger sample duration, thus smaller sample sizes should be taken with a grain of salt. In other words, this is not a good metric by which to judge players such as Keith Aulie (six games) or Brandon Sagal (two games). Tampa Bay's team Corsi rating is .477, which should be a benchmark. Thanks for reading!

This post was written by a member of the Raw Charge community and does not necessarily represent or express the views or opinions of Raw Charge staff.

Log In Sign Up

Log In Sign Up

Forgot password?

We'll email you a reset link.

If you signed up using a 3rd party account like Facebook or Twitter, please login with it instead.

Forgot password?

Try another email?

Almost done,

By becoming a registered user, you are also agreeing to our Terms and confirming that you have read our Privacy Policy.

Join Raw Charge

You must be a member of Raw Charge to participate.

We have our own Community Guidelines at Raw Charge. You should read them.

Join Raw Charge

You must be a member of Raw Charge to participate.

We have our own Community Guidelines at Raw Charge. You should read them.




Choose an available username to complete sign up.

In order to provide our users with a better overall experience, we ask for more information from Facebook when using it to login so that we can learn more about our audience and provide you with the best possible experience. We do not store specific user data and the sharing of it is not required to login with Facebook.